User contributions for 82.39.195.21
Appearance
For 82.39.195.21 talk block log logs global block log filter log
9 July 2008
- 15:3815:38, 9 July 2008 diff hist +905 Newcastle upon Tyne →Urban development
8 July 2008
- 21:1321:13, 8 July 2008 diff hist +943 Newcastle upon Tyne →Urban development: Assuming we have reached consensus been 24hours since last comment.
7 July 2008
- 18:2618:26, 7 July 2008 diff hist +1,648 Talk:Newcastle upon Tyne →Citations pulled down on the 6th July 2008
6 July 2008
- 17:1917:19, 6 July 2008 diff hist +925 Newcastle upon Tyne my last edit of the day, I accomodated from your concerns the other day. Now you are nit picking.
- 17:1717:17, 6 July 2008 diff hist +3,003 Talk:Newcastle upon Tyne No edit summary
- 16:4516:45, 6 July 2008 diff hist +925 Newcastle upon Tyne Undid revision 223921970 by Dbam (talk)
- 11:1211:12, 6 July 2008 diff hist −2 Newcastle upon Tyne →Urban development
- 11:1111:11, 6 July 2008 diff hist +927 Newcastle upon Tyne There you go it acknowledges the opinion of a critic that is talking to an audience who acknowledge his knowledge. Part of the premise admits it is opinion.
- 01:5201:52, 6 July 2008 diff hist −641 Newcastle upon Tyne Dbam, it acknowledges the author and does not say it is the opinion of all... If you want to be edit, then put the authors name in sentence. Me I don't see the pointin thatbecause youcanlookat citaton
- 01:4501:45, 6 July 2008 diff hist +1,329 Newcastle upon Tyne Dbam it doesn't say described by 'all' as England's best looking city. It says described as Englands best city, by one person. If you want to edit it, put the author of the book/articles name in.(ROOM
4 July 2008
- 15:1215:12, 4 July 2008 diff hist +1 Newcastle upon Tyne →Urban development
- 15:1015:10, 4 July 2008 diff hist +666 Newcastle upon Tyne →Urban development