User contributions for WikiAkivaz
Appearance
A user with 21 edits. Account created on 30 January 2024.
31 January 2024
- 18:5518:55, 31 January 2024 diff hist +298 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zavika →Suspected sockpuppets: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:5318:53, 31 January 2024 diff hist +168 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zavika →Suspected sockpuppets: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:4118:41, 31 January 2024 diff hist +175 User talk:Schminnte →Question from WikiAkivaz (17:44, 31 January 2024): Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:3818:38, 31 January 2024 diff hist +861 User talk:Zavika →Socking: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:1318:13, 31 January 2024 diff hist +171 User talk:Schminnte →Question from WikiAkivaz (17:44, 31 January 2024): Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4617:46, 31 January 2024 diff hist +222 User talk:Schminnte →Question from WikiAkivaz (17:46, 31 January 2024): new section Tag: Mentorship module question
- 17:4417:44, 31 January 2024 diff hist +250 User talk:Schminnte →Question from WikiAkivaz (17:44, 31 January 2024): new section Tag: Mentorship module question
- 17:4117:41, 31 January 2024 diff hist +8 ClamAV correction on the phrase sense Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 17:3817:38, 31 January 2024 diff hist +27 ClamAV Added sources Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 17:3817:38, 31 January 2024 diff hist −1 ClamAV Typpo mistake corrected Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 17:3717:37, 31 January 2024 diff hist +1,122 ClamAV Edited the "Real-time file Scanning" field - because apparently people here just care about lobbying to promote proprietary software... And didn't do nothing during that time to update this field (that wasn't updated for YEARS). Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 17:2317:23, 31 January 2024 diff hist +124 User talk:Zavika →Socking: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:2217:22, 31 January 2024 diff hist +331 User talk:Zavika →Socking: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:1417:14, 31 January 2024 diff hist +406 User talk:Zavika →Socking: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1813:18, 31 January 2024 diff hist +598 ClamAV Regarding Splunk's study, there was't important information about its reliability while scanning certain kinds of files & malware - took advantage of the work made by previous volunteers that I found in the reviewing history, and did adapt the text. NOTE: "Trojans" aren't necessarily the same as "Banking Trojans", so be careful about those terminology changes. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:0813:08, 31 January 2024 diff hist +2 ClamAV There was some weird punctuation, example: "programs designed to steal client information. E.g. Keyloggers". Added some " - ". Tag: Visual edit
- 13:0513:05, 31 January 2024 diff hist +579 ClamAV The last statement "while critiquing it for being somewhat difficult to use" was very vague, and wasn't explaining very important facts for the readers can understand why it was classified was "difficult to use". Added important information to justify it. Tag: Visual edit
30 January 2024
- 21:4821:48, 30 January 2024 diff hist +1 ClamAV Lack of attention regarding punctuation - added a period. Tag: Visual edit
- 21:3221:32, 30 January 2024 diff hist +3 ClamAV There was a grammar mistake made by the previous editors. Tag: Visual edit
- 21:2621:26, 30 January 2024 diff hist +1 ClamAV Spotted a grammar mistake commited by my end Tag: Visual edit
- 21:2521:25, 30 January 2024 diff hist +1,023 ClamAV I saw some issues around the latest editions - so I decided to input some recent data from an article's review (from a relatively popular cybersecurity website). Tag: Visual edit