User contributions for A2carville
Appearance
A user with 53 edits. Account created on 18 March 2018.
17 December 2019
- 21:5021:50, 17 December 2019 diff hist +42 Harjit Sajjan "Pivotal Player" were the exact words used by Vernon to describe Sajjan
- 21:2421:24, 17 December 2019 diff hist +6 m Harjit Sajjan No edit summary
- 21:2321:23, 17 December 2019 diff hist −8 Harjit Sajjan Exact quote from Vernon
- 21:2121:21, 17 December 2019 diff hist −31 Harjit Sajjan Exact quote from Vernon
- 21:1621:16, 17 December 2019 diff hist +453 Harjit Sajjan David Fraser's statement on Sajjan's role in Operation Medusa
6 December 2019
- 20:0420:04, 6 December 2019 diff hist −14 m Marathi people Grammatical correction
- 18:4518:45, 6 December 2019 diff hist +126 m Panipat (film) More accurate
- 00:2300:23, 6 December 2019 diff hist +40 m Marathi people Historians (English and Indian) used Maratha to predominantly denote the marathi-speaking peoples.
- 00:1900:19, 6 December 2019 diff hist −19 m Marathi people Marathas are a part (in fact the major part) of the Marathi people.
5 December 2019
- 23:5923:59, 5 December 2019 diff hist +15 m Balaji Baji Rao Bengal Subah
- 23:5823:58, 5 December 2019 diff hist +156 m Balaji Baji Rao More on Raghoji's behaviour in Bengal Subah
- 03:3303:33, 5 December 2019 diff hist −6 m Balaji Baji Rao Not a massive defeat. All available sources indicate that Ahmed Shah Durrani suffered tremendous losses as well.
- 03:3203:32, 5 December 2019 diff hist −102 m Balaji Baji Rao This is not a true statement at all. The reign of Madhavrao after Nanasaheb was marked by direct military campaigns by the Peshwa.
- 03:3003:30, 5 December 2019 diff hist −242 m Balaji Baji Rao All available sources indicate that it was post-Madhavrao that the Maratha Empire started to devolve into a confederacy. During Nanasaheb's tenure, it was very much an empire. Lot of these disparaging statements in this article seem to be done in bad faith and without any credible references.
4 December 2019
- 22:5922:59, 4 December 2019 diff hist +51 m Balaji Baji Rao Sakharam Bapu Bokil was always the main commander of Raghunathrao in his expansion expeditions.
- 22:4622:46, 4 December 2019 diff hist +4 m Balaji Baji Rao chieftains instead of chiefs
- 22:4622:46, 4 December 2019 diff hist +64 m Balaji Baji Rao Expansion was primarily led my Raghunathrao Peshwa with the help of the many chieftains of the Maratha Empire
- 19:2319:23, 4 December 2019 diff hist +24 m Sadashivrao Bhau Role of Mahadjipant Purandare and Sakharam Bapu Bokil was also to function as commanders under Sadashiv Rao Bhau. Not to simply act as advisers.
28 November 2019
- 08:4208:42, 28 November 2019 diff hist −114 Maratha Confederacy No citation even though it's such a sweeping generalization
- 07:4407:44, 28 November 2019 diff hist −209 m Tryambak Shankar Shejwalkar This is not a factual statement and does not carry any context
20 November 2019
- 23:3823:38, 20 November 2019 diff hist +9 m Kavi Kalash No edit summary
- 23:3823:38, 20 November 2019 diff hist +25 m Kavi Kalash No edit summary
19 November 2019
- 22:4922:49, 19 November 2019 diff hist −696 m Govind Pant Bundela Credible references needed as to who and where refuted the allegations by Rajwade.
- 21:4221:42, 19 November 2019 diff hist −185 m Deshastha Brahmin No citation of reference for the statement
- 20:0220:02, 19 November 2019 diff hist +79 m Deshastha Brahmin No edit summary
- 20:0020:00, 19 November 2019 diff hist +8 m Bajirao I No edit summary
- 18:2618:26, 19 November 2019 diff hist −5 m Govind Pant Bundela grammar correction
- 17:1917:19, 19 November 2019 diff hist −6 m List of Deshastha Brahmins Added Antaji Mankeshwar Gandhe and Purandare family
- 17:1917:19, 19 November 2019 diff hist +513 m List of Deshastha Brahmins No edit summary
- 17:1417:14, 19 November 2019 diff hist +11 m Govind Pant Bundela No edit summary
- 17:1317:13, 19 November 2019 diff hist +15 m Govind Pant Bundela No edit summary
- 17:1117:11, 19 November 2019 diff hist +48 m Krishnarao Pant Pratinidhi Deshastha Brahmin family
- 17:0917:09, 19 November 2019 diff hist +34 m Parshuram Pant Pratinidhi No edit summary
- 17:0917:09, 19 November 2019 diff hist +59 m Shripatrao Pant Pratinidhi Deshastha Brahmin family
- 11:1211:12, 19 November 2019 diff hist +27 Govind Pant Bundela By the time Govind Pant Bundele started gaining experience, Malharrao Holkar and Antaji were already well-established in North India. Also, the full name is Antaji Mankeshwar Gandhe.
14 November 2019
- 17:5017:50, 14 November 2019 diff hist −15 Maratha Confederacy The Maratha Empire consisted of folks from numerous castes and communities (Peasants, cobblers, nomadic tribes like Dhangar, Fisherman caste like Koli, the Brahmin chieftains like Govind Pant Bundele/Patwardhan/Balwant Mehendale). The word Maratha here gives the impression that this was related solely to the 96K Maratha caste. Marathi-speaking would be more appropriate over here given the widely divergent nature of the peoples who formed the Maratha Empire.
13 November 2019
- 17:4617:46, 13 November 2019 diff hist −100 Maratha Confederacy No citation here
- 17:4217:42, 13 November 2019 diff hist −51 Balaji Baji Rao The reference book cited here by G S Chabbra gives a much more nuanced account of the battles of the Maratha Chiefs. To reduce all of this to a simple sweeping generalization like "their acts of plunder alienated the masses" is not appropriate and is probably indicative of the the bias of the author towards the Marathas..
2 April 2019
- 23:0123:01, 2 April 2019 diff hist −63 m Maratha Confederacy (not to be confused as Marathi speaking people of Maharashtra) ..exactly why is this statement here? It is evident from all the available history that the Maratha empire was comprised essentially OF the Marathi-speaking peoples (many different castes/communities of Marathi peoples including the Brahmin Peshwas)...This statement only serves to confuse (perhaps intentionally) and separate the Maratha Empire, when in fact, it is an important part of the history of Marathi folks.
- 19:4219:42, 2 April 2019 diff hist −145 m Marathi people The issue is not about making a cosmetic change to the language. A pejorative reference is being portrayed as if it were some scholarly information, and given further promotion by putting this in the lede as if it were a crucial theme of the article. There are similar pejorative references for every group on earth. Are pejorative words used in the Lede to describe African-Americans? Or other Indian groups? Lastly, on what pages of 198/199 do Rujuta Diwekar and Shobhaa De reclaim this?
- 18:3818:38, 2 April 2019 diff hist −142 Marathi people The references cited i.e 'Yandu Gundu', 'Bhaiyya' for other Indian groups are anecdotal reports. A lede is a paragraph that summarizes the main ideas of an article. The pejorative reference to Maharashtrians is a main idea according to wikipedia author Jonathansammy? This is a clear case of someone having an axe to grind against a specific group of peoples and abusing Wikipedia for that purpose.
- 18:0818:08, 2 April 2019 diff hist +112 m Talk:Marathi people Kudos to Arya Rajya Maharashtra
20 March 2018
- 18:4018:40, 20 March 2018 diff hist −44 Talk:Sachin Tendulkar →Caste==
19 March 2018
- 17:3817:38, 19 March 2018 diff hist +13 Talk:Madhuri Dixit →Caste references
- 17:3817:38, 19 March 2018 diff hist +756 Talk:Madhuri Dixit →Caste references: new section
- 00:0400:04, 19 March 2018 diff hist −8 Vikram Pandit Deleting 'Karhade Brahmin' in the mention of his caste in the article. The reference cited mentions just 'Brahmin' and not 'Karhade Brahmin'.
18 March 2018
- 23:5723:57, 18 March 2018 diff hist −18 Madhuri Dixit The mention of the caste is not referenced and is in poor taste, so deleting it. It's astonishing how often for Maharashtrian celebrities, the caste is a prominent mention on their Wikipedia pages, quite unlike celebrities from other parts of India.
- 23:5023:50, 18 March 2018 diff hist −30 Sunil Gavaskar Deleted the reference to a "Saraswat". There was no reference provided for this and in any case what is the point of mentioning the caste?
- 23:4323:43, 18 March 2018 diff hist +382 Talk:Sachin Tendulkar Mention of caste is in very poor taste