User contributions for Apndrew
Appearance
A user with 75 edits. Account created on 9 June 2010.
15 July 2024
- 05:4705:47, 15 July 2024 diff hist +419 George Gascón No edit summary Tag: Reverted
5 July 2024
- 01:5501:55, 5 July 2024 diff hist +383 Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia →Anti-Israel Bias on Wikipedia: Reply Tag: Reply
3 July 2024
- 01:1001:10, 3 July 2024 diff hist +1,351 Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia No edit summary
- 00:5800:58, 3 July 2024 diff hist −3,297 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 00:5700:57, 3 July 2024 diff hist −17,352 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
22 June 2024
- 03:5703:57, 22 June 2024 diff hist −4 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 03:5603:56, 22 June 2024 diff hist +13 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 03:5503:55, 22 June 2024 diff hist +355 User talk:Apndrew →June 2024 2: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:2901:29, 22 June 2024 diff hist 0 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 01:1901:19, 22 June 2024 diff hist −146 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 01:0201:02, 22 June 2024 diff hist +254 User talk:Apndrew →June 2024 2: Reply Tag: Reply
21 June 2024
- 17:5317:53, 21 June 2024 diff hist +10 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 17:3917:39, 21 June 2024 diff hist +5 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 17:3817:38, 21 June 2024 diff hist +3,143 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 15:0515:05, 21 June 2024 diff hist +94 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 01:1901:19, 21 June 2024 diff hist +667 User talk:Apndrew No edit summary
- 01:0401:04, 21 June 2024 diff hist +177 User talk:Apndrew →Introduction to contentious topics: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:0101:01, 21 June 2024 diff hist +517 Anne Norton Added additional sources as requested and Undid revision 1230155289 by ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) Tag: Reverted
- 00:5100:51, 21 June 2024 diff hist +2,579 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 00:3200:32, 21 June 2024 diff hist +1,016 Ideological bias on Wikipedia Undid wrongly deleted revision 1230153189 by ScottishFinnishRadish (talk). There is no reason to delete this addition. It is clear, concise, directly related to to the entry, and well sourced. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 00:3000:30, 21 June 2024 diff hist +997 Arabic Wikipedia Undid wrongly deleted revision 1230153091 by ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) There is no reason to delete this edit. It is clear, concise, related to the topic and well sourced. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 00:1700:17, 21 June 2024 diff hist +404 Talk:LGBT rights in the State of Palestine →Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2024
- 00:1300:13, 21 June 2024 diff hist +1,000 Talk:LGBT rights in the State of Palestine →Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2024: new section
20 June 2024
- 23:5523:55, 20 June 2024 diff hist −45 Talk:Palestinian stone-throwing No edit summary
- 23:5323:53, 20 June 2024 diff hist +1,040 Talk:Palestinian stone-throwing No edit summary
- 23:4223:42, 20 June 2024 diff hist +1,554 Talk:Palestinian stone-throwing →Fix false sentence in first paragraph.: new section
- 23:3223:32, 20 June 2024 diff hist +946 Talk:Palestinian stone-throwing →Blatantly False Sentence in First Paragraph: new section Tag: New topic
- 02:2202:22, 20 June 2024 diff hist +328 User talk:Apndrew →June 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:1902:19, 20 June 2024 diff hist +997 Arabic Wikipedia No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 02:1702:17, 20 June 2024 diff hist +1,016 Ideological bias on Wikipedia No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 02:0302:03, 20 June 2024 diff hist +706 Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia →Anti-Israel Bias on Wikipedia: new section Tag: New topic
19 June 2024
- 19:3719:37, 19 June 2024 diff hist +252 Ideological bias on Wikipedia Has strong support through a publication and is not cherry picked. It is entirely related to this entry as it shows Wikipedia has been accused of anti-Israel bias. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 19:3219:32, 19 June 2024 diff hist +252 Ideological bias on Wikipedia Undid revision 1229941607 by Objective3000 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 15:4415:44, 19 June 2024 diff hist +252 Ideological bias on Wikipedia No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 15:1615:16, 19 June 2024 diff hist 0 Anne Norton No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 13:2413:24, 19 June 2024 diff hist +360 Anne Norton No edit summary Tags: Reverted possible BLP issue or vandalism
- 13:1713:17, 19 June 2024 diff hist +126 Talk:Joseph Massad →Joseph Massad called the October 7 attacks on Israel "awesome" and "astounding"
- 13:1713:17, 19 June 2024 diff hist +431 Talk:Joseph Massad →Joseph Massad called the October 7 attacks on Israel "awesome" and "astounding": new section Tag: New topic
31 May 2024
- 02:0802:08, 31 May 2024 diff hist +286 Anne Norton →Controversy Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism
- 02:0202:02, 31 May 2024 diff hist +9 Anne Norton No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 02:0102:01, 31 May 2024 diff hist +107 Anne Norton No edit summary Tag: Reverted
23 May 2024
- 03:0703:07, 23 May 2024 diff hist −132 Port of Gaza This statement about most structures being destroyed is false. The statement of the port of Gaza being destroyed has no support.
22 May 2024
- 02:4502:45, 22 May 2024 diff hist +16 Sorrell Booke Providing more detail.
20 May 2024
- 05:1105:11, 20 May 2024 diff hist +7 Eugene R. Fidell No edit summary current
- 05:0105:01, 20 May 2024 diff hist −28 Criticism of the United Nations Source article does not support statement that he retracted issue of bias against Israel. The tile states it, but the body of the document states only that "he did not believe there was discrimination, but also insisted Israel should not face bias at the organization." As to bias, he never retracts, he states that as a member state, Israel "should have equal rights and opportunities without having any bias, any discrimination. " but never retracts his earlier position that there was bias.
17 October 2016
- 13:3113:31, 17 October 2016 diff hist +27 Marilyn Monroe Added religion which is common in summary box
17 December 2015
- 19:0519:05, 17 December 2015 diff hist +21 Marilyn Monroe No edit summary
7 December 2015
- 23:2123:21, 7 December 2015 diff hist −1,257 Palestinian stone-throwing →Second Intifada: Removed someone's aggressive Point of View and biased opinion argument. Citing someone who shares your biased opinion doesn't make it less biased or more factual.