User contributions for Hotpass105
A user with 70 edits. Account created on 27 March 2014.
7 July 2020
- 16:3516:35, 7 July 2020 diff hist +452 Talk:Circumcision →Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&oldid=966526030
- 16:1816:18, 7 July 2020 diff hist +224 Talk:Circumcision →Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&oldid=966526030
- 16:1416:14, 7 July 2020 diff hist +331 User talk:MrOllie →Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&oldid=966526030: new section
- 16:0716:07, 7 July 2020 diff hist +1,636 Talk:Circumcision →Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circumcision&oldid=966526030: new section
- 15:5615:56, 7 July 2020 diff hist −834 Circumcision Undid revision 966526204 by MrOllie (talk) - from Wikipedia's own guidance on reverts: "f you see a good-faith edit which you feel does not improve the article, make a good-faith effort to reword instead of reverting it. Similarly, if you make an edit which is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit" - Feel free to readd content where appropriate. I don't accept consensus on this information. See you in talk. Tag: Undo
- 15:4715:47, 7 July 2020 diff hist −834 Circumcision →Human immunodeficiency virus: This section paraphrases a discussion on STI (not HIV) transmission from the Weiss study. The Wikipedia omitted the phrase indicating this from their paragraph.
20 April 2020
- 14:5914:59, 20 April 2020 diff hist +68 MagneRide No edit summary
16 October 2019
- 20:5620:56, 16 October 2019 diff hist +448 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Alexbrn reported by User:Guarapiranga (Result: )
- 18:4918:49, 16 October 2019 diff hist +596 Talk:Circumcision →Large quotes
- 16:5216:52, 16 October 2019 diff hist −1,851 Circumcision Condensed overview and moved specific medical arguments to relevant subsection
- 16:4616:46, 16 October 2019 diff hist +600 Circumcision →Medical: added contemporary research on VMC
- 16:3616:36, 16 October 2019 diff hist +1,268 Circumcision Edited stats, no evidence that the probably is additive. Trimmed unsupported text. Added more recent research perspectives
- 11:4911:49, 16 October 2019 diff hist −1 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
- 11:4811:48, 16 October 2019 diff hist +995 User talk:Bon courage →October 2019 Edit War: new section
- 11:3611:36, 16 October 2019 diff hist +1,011 Circumcision →Medical: Added statistics reflecting medical indication for circumcision and recent research results on VMC experiments in Africa. Also included references.
- 11:2511:25, 16 October 2019 diff hist −97 Circumcision Reverted to revision 921511561 by Guarapiranga (talk): Well sourced information - improves neutral point of view herein and expands scope to encompass contemporary thought (TW) Tag: Undo
- 11:2411:24, 16 October 2019 diff hist +438 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
27 September 2019
- 12:5812:58, 27 September 2019 diff hist +292 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
- 12:5412:54, 27 September 2019 diff hist +95 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
- 12:5412:54, 27 September 2019 diff hist +476 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
- 12:4712:47, 27 September 2019 diff hist −264 Circumcision Undid revision 918182036 by Alexbrn (talk) EDIT: per talk page, amended text for clarity, and again removed: "A study by the CDC suggests that newborn circumcision would be societally cost-effective in the United States based on circumcision's efficacy against the heterosexual transmission of HIV alone, without considering any other cost benefits.[2] " Please address concerns in talk page before re-adding. Tag: Undo
- 12:3412:34, 27 September 2019 diff hist +1,468 User talk:Bon courage No edit summary
- 11:4611:46, 27 September 2019 diff hist −356 Circumcision Undid revision 918095644 by Doc James (talk) I have been VERY clear. DO NOT REVERT WITHOUT AMENDING CITATIONS OR VERIFYING CONTENT. This is not about whether the material is cited, but rather THE CITATIONS DO NOT SUPPORT THE CLAIMS! Tag: Undo
- 11:4411:44, 27 September 2019 diff hist +2 m Talk:Circumcision →RE: Economic Considerations
- 11:4411:44, 27 September 2019 diff hist +16 Talk:Circumcision →RE: Economic Considerations
- 11:4411:44, 27 September 2019 diff hist −9 Talk:Circumcision →RE: Economic Considerations
- 11:4311:43, 27 September 2019 diff hist +940 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
26 September 2019
- 21:1921:19, 26 September 2019 diff hist −356 Circumcision Undid revision 917924014 by Alexbrn (talk) If you checked WP:V you would have realized that "all quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an ***inline citation*** that directly supports the material." Tag: Undo
- 21:1621:16, 26 September 2019 diff hist +22 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
- 20:5520:55, 26 September 2019 diff hist +1 Talk:Circumcision →RE: Economic Considerations
- 20:5520:55, 26 September 2019 diff hist −2 Talk:Circumcision →RE: Economic Considerations
- 20:5520:55, 26 September 2019 diff hist +96 Talk:Circumcision →RE: Economic Considerations
- 20:5420:54, 26 September 2019 diff hist +755 Talk:Circumcision →RE: Economic Considerations: new section
25 September 2019
- 23:2823:28, 25 September 2019 diff hist −260 Circumcision →Economic considerations: Removed the following text: " A study by the CDC suggests that newborn circumcision would be societally cost-effective in the United States based on circumcision's efficacy against the heterosexual transmission of HIV alone, without considering any other cost benefits.<ref name=AAP_2012/>" (1) The statements do not reflect the content of the medical research.
- 23:2323:23, 25 September 2019 diff hist −96 m Circumcision →Economic considerations: Removed statements re: economic arguments: "with cost savings estimated in the billions of US dollars over 20 years" were removed due to lack of reference to such conclusions in the quoted material. Please use direct quotes when possible and avoid drawing subjective conclusions from material unrelated to your own opinions or ideas.
- 23:2023:20, 25 September 2019 diff hist +73 m Circumcision Undid revision 917884358 by Hotpass105 (talk) Incomplete information re: edits. Economic arguments: "with cost savings estimated in the billions of US dollars over 20 years" were removed due to lack of reference to such conclusions in the quoted material. Please use direct quotes when possible and avoid drawing subjective conclusions from material unrelated to your own opinions or ideas. Tag: Undo
- 23:1923:19, 25 September 2019 diff hist −73 Circumcision →Economic considerations: Removed the following text: "
20 September 2019
- 14:0714:07, 20 September 2019 diff hist +9 m Atlanta's John Marshall Law School Attached articles are not from REPUTABLE source and only allege the author's identity.
2 May 2019
- 16:5716:57, 2 May 2019 diff hist +2 Talk:Religion and circumcision No edit summary
- 16:5616:56, 2 May 2019 diff hist +1 Talk:Religion and circumcision No edit summary
- 16:5616:56, 2 May 2019 diff hist +2,574 Talk:Religion and circumcision →Recent edits and reverts Reply Comment
- 13:0113:01, 2 May 2019 diff hist +427 Talk:Circumcision →Text
- 12:5812:58, 2 May 2019 diff hist −1,686 Circumcision Restoring Version 19:29, 1 May 2019 - Doc James
- 12:4612:46, 2 May 2019 diff hist +148 Talk:Circumcision No edit summary
- 12:2912:29, 2 May 2019 diff hist +389 Circumcision In RE: Doc James request for clarification. 1) Improved text in the second sentence a) revised pro aspect with links to relevant information in article b) revised cons with direct quote, removed paraphrasing from author's work and improved citation (now includes pg. #) 2) Fixed citation formatting, so it now appears as superscript.
- 12:1512:15, 2 May 2019 diff hist +59 Talk:Circumcision →Text
- 12:1412:14, 2 May 2019 diff hist +335 Talk:Circumcision →Text
1 May 2019
- 23:2823:28, 1 May 2019 diff hist +1,297 Circumcision 1) Edited introduction for brevity, readability and cohesiveness, moved content to relevant section and removed redundant information. EDIT: a)Corrected Doyle source and added additional reference for biological significance of foreskin. b)See talk for line by line justification for removing the aforementioned paragraph. 2) Updated subjective interpretation of circumcision rates in the US with actual data from CDC (see citation). EDIT: No challenge to this, so it remains the same.
- 23:1123:11, 1 May 2019 diff hist +2,994 Talk:Circumcision →Text
- 20:0920:09, 1 May 2019 diff hist +1 Talk:Religion and circumcision →Recent edits and reverts Reply Comment
