Jump to content

User contributions for Neuronautical

A user with 77 edits. Account created on 23 February 2010.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

6 June 2024

20 February 2024

10 January 2024

9 January 2024

6 January 2024

8 November 2023

19 October 2023

20 September 2023

11 September 2023

13 July 2023

12 July 2023

26 June 2023

22 June 2023

16 January 2023

7 August 2021

  • 21:2321:23, 7 August 2021 diff hist +27 Historicity of JesusThere are millions of historians and virtually all of them have never weighed in on the historicity of Jesus. You are misrepresenting the sources by changing a particular subfield into "all historians". It's like when a tv program calls someone a "scientist". Be specific and true to the sources, it changes the whole meaning and doesn't seem so agenda-driven, even if you clearly are. Tag: Reverted

5 August 2021

4 August 2021

  • 20:4320:43, 4 August 2021 diff hist +2 User:NeuronauticalNo edit summary current
  • 20:4220:42, 4 August 2021 diff hist +4 User:NeuronauticalNo edit summary
  • 20:4120:41, 4 August 2021 diff hist −9 m Historicity of JesusUndid revision 1037144702 by Joshua Jonathan (talk) Considering he is deceased, Dunn is not exactly a current scholar in the field, and in his last decade did not contribute much. He and many other scholars take for granted the historicity of Jesus and don't take criticism seriously. Atwill is far more knowledgeable about the subject, in my humble opinion. Again, the loudest/oldest/most-engrained aren't necessarily right. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • 19:1719:17, 4 August 2021 diff hist −9 m Historicity of JesusThe term "virtually all" is a weighted agenda-driven term, seemingly chosen to discredit the credible scholarly voices who disagree. Robert M. Price, Thomas L. Brodie, Earl Doherty, George Albert Wells, John M. Allegro, and many other scholars exist which think otherwise. I humbly submit we use the term "many" and let the scholarship speak for itself, and allow the reader to decide whether the loudest voices in academia get to constitute "virtually everyone". Tag: Reverted
  • 18:5318:53, 4 August 2021 diff hist −13 m Fouquieria splendensBoth 'cactuses' and 'cacti' are accepted plurals of cactus in English. To whomever edited in "(it's cacti)": that is not how we do this encyclopedia editing thing, and also maybe do two seconds of research before editing next time. Tag: Manual revert

28 March 2021

9 April 2018

21 November 2017

25 January 2016

10 November 2015

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)