Jump to content

User:PrimalMustelid/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PrimalMustelid/sandbox
Temporal range: Middle Eocene–Early Oligocene
P. magnum skeleton
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Perissodactyla
Family: †Palaeotheriidae
Genus: †Palaeotherium
Cuvier, 1804
Type species
†Palaeotherium magnum
Cuvier, 1804
Other species
  • †P. medium Cuvier, 1804
  • †P. crassum Cuvier, 1805
  • †P. curtum Cuvier, 1812
  • †P. duvali Pomel, 1853
  • †P. castrense Noulet, 1863
  • †P. siderolithicum Pictet & Humbert, 1869
  • †P. eocaenum Gervais, 1875
  • †P. lautricense Stehlin, 1904
  • †P. muehlbergi Stehlin, 1904
  • †P. renevieri Stehlin, 1904
  • †P. ruetimeyeri Stehlin, 1904
  • †P. pomeli Franzen, 1968
  • †P. crusafonti Casanovas-Cladellas, 1975
  • †P. llamaquiquense Casanovas-Cladellas & Santafé Llopis, 1991
  • †P. giganteum Cuesta, 1993

For subspecies suggested, see below.

Synonyms
Genus synonymy
  • Paleotherium Cuvier, 1804
  • Paloeotherium Cuvier, 1804
  • Palaetherium Rafinesque, 1814
  • Paloetherium Rafinesque, 1814
  • Salaeotherium Roulin, 1829
  • Palacotherium von Meyer, 1838
Synonyms of P. magnum
  • P. girondicum Blainville, 1846
  • P. aniciense Gervais, 1848–1852
  • P. subgracile Aymard, 1853
  • P. magnum parisiense Gervais, 1859
  • P. stehlini Depéret, 1917
  • P. franzeni Casanovas-Cladellas & Santafé Llopis, 1980
Synonyms of P. medium
  • P. brivatense Bravard, 1843
  • P. suevicum Fraas, 1869
  • P. möschi Stehlin, 1904
  • P. euzetense Depéret, 1917
Synonyms of P. crassum
  • P. indeterminatum Cuvier, 1822
Synonyms of P. curtum
  • P. latum Cuvier, 1822
  • P. buseri Stehlin, 1904
Synonyms of P. duvali
  • P. heimi Stehlin, 1904
  • P. kleini Dietrich, 1922
Synonyms of P. muehlbergi
  • P. velaunum Blainville, 1848
Dubious species
  • P. gracile von Meyer, 1839
  • P. parvulum de Serres, 1844
  • P. commune Blainville, 1846
  • P. primaevum Aymard, 1853
  • P. gervaisii Aymard, 1853

Palaeotherium (Ancient Greek for 'old beast') is an extinct genus of perissodactyl ungulate known from the Mid Eocene to earliest Oligocene of Europe. First described by French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1804, Palaeotherium was among the first Paleogene mammals to be described.
































Research history[edit]

Main article: Research history of Palaeotherium

First descriptions[edit]

Fossil skull of Palaeotherium medium as illustrated in 1782

In 1782, the French naturalist Robert de Lamanon described a fossil skull retaining the upper and lower jaws that was collected from the quarries of Montmartre, a large hill near Paris, France, that belonged to the nobleman Philippe-Laurent de Joubert. He recognized that the morphologies of its molars and incisors were roughly akin to those of ruminants but noted that its dentition still lacked any modern analogues. As a result, he hypothesized that the animal was extinct, had amphibious behaviors, and fed on both herbs and fish.[1][2]

Since 1796, the French naturalist Georges Cuvier innovated the idea of vanished worlds of extinct animals, but as his observations of fossils were mostly limited to drawings and very fragmentary fossil materials stored at the National Museum of Natural History, France, his palaeontological insight remained limited early on. The fossils of Montmartre were credited with great importance to the field of palaeontology, as the fossil taxa found near Paris were embedded in deeper and harder sediments, falling between the Pleistocene-aged mammals and the Cretaceous-aged reptiles.[2] In 1798, he documented fossils from Montmartre, suggesting initially that they could have belonged to the canid genus Canis based on its dentition.[3] Not long after in the same year, he changed his mind and thought that the fossil mammal instead would have been within the order of pachyderms, theorizing that it would have been closest to tapirs and that it would have had trunks like them. He also figured out that the animals of Montmartre comprised of multiple different species with different sizes and numbers of toes.[4][2]

Early taxonomy and depictions[edit]

Sketches of the skull fossil of P. medium (left) and reconstructed P. medium skull drawings among other fossil assortments (right)

In 1804, Georges Cuvier described the sets of fossils from the gypsum quarries of the outskirts of Paris (known as the Paris Basin). Describing the skull previously reported by de Lamanon, he confirmed that it belonged to a mammal, had a complete set of 44 total teeth, and had molar morphologies similar to those of rhinoceroses and hyraxes. The naturalist, recognizing that its separate affinities from other mammals, established the genus name Palaeotherium and established the first species name Palaeotherium medium.[5][6] The genus name means "ancient beast," for which the etymology is a compound of the Greek prefix παλαιός ('palaios') meaning 'old' or 'ancient' and the suffix θήρ ('thēr') meaning 'beast' or 'wild animal'.[7] He debunked Lamanon's hypothesis that Palaeotherium was an omnivorous amphibian and suspected that it had trunks akin to those of tapirs.[5][2]

Later, he wrote about a species that he deemed to have similar dentition to P. medium to the extent that it belonged to Palaeotherium. Cuvier observed that the species had larger-sized dentition compared to the other species based on imprints that he was provided. Thus, he established the species Palaeotherium magnum.[8] He also gave mentions to the postcranial fossils of the genus and listed a newly recognized species named Palaeotherium minus.[9] In a later journal of the same year, Cuvier described a mostly complete skeleton from the French commune of Pantin that he determined to have belonged to P. minus.[10]

Reconstruction of the skeleton of P. magnum as depicted in 1822

In 1805, Cuvier described additional postcranial fossil bones of Palaeotherium. He noted that its forefeet consisted of three short toes and that no other animal had postcranial bones that closely resembled those of the extinct genus. Nonetheless, he also gave emphasis to some of the fossil foot bones resembling those of either tapirs or rhinoceroses. Based on the metacarpal bone shapes located on the front feet, he erected the species name P. crassum, mentioning that it was a distinct species from P. medium.[11]

In 1812, he examined more metacarpal bone material that he classified as belonging to Palaeotherium. He stated that the newer material was nearly the size of those of P. crassum but that it was shorter than even those of P. minus. Thus, he felt the need to establish another species P. curtum based on the fossils. He also listed five new additional species from surrounding areas of France that he did not further elaborate on, such as the rhinoceros-sized P. giganteum, the ox-sized P. tapiroïdes, the pig-sized P. buxovillanum plus P. aurelianense, and the sheep-sized P. occitanicum.[12]

Drawings of species classified to Palaeotherium and Anoplotherium by Charles Léopold Laurillard under the work of Georges Cuvier

The naturalist also suggested palaeobiologies of the four species of Palaeotherium that he described from the gypsum quarries. He acknowledged that P. magnum had skull and limb bone material but lacked vertebra and rib fossils. Regardless, he was able to speculate based on available material that P. magnum would have resembled a tapir the size of a horse with bare amounts of hair. He also hypothesized that P. crassum would have resembled a tapir and been the size of one, which in theory would have caused people to confuse the two. P. medium, he suggested, would have also resembled a tapir but differed by higher legs and longer feet. He was able to construct a speculative skeletal reconstruction drawing of P. minus because of a previously found skeleton and hypothesized that it was smaller than a sheep and could have been cursorial with its slender legs and face. Finally, he theorized that P. curtum would have been the bulkiest species with lower legs compared to P. minus that were stocky like those of P. crassum. Cuvier also suggested that Palaeotherium as in the entire genus was tridactyl (or three-toed).[12][13]

In 1822, Cuvier recognized additional species of Palaeotherium based on postcranial materials. He also depicted a drawn reconstruction of the skeleton of P. magnum, outlining that it was the size of a Javan rhinoceros, was stocky in body build, and had a massive head.[14] Palaeotherium was also depicted in 1822 drawings by the French palaeontologist Charles Léopold Laurillard under the direction of Cuvier.[15] In 1824, he listed most species of Palaeotherium that he previously named and described, namely P. magnum, P. medium, P. crassum, P. latum, P. curtum, P. minus, and P. aureliense. He also recognized an additional species P. isselanum, but he did not describe its fossils.[16]

Sculpture of P. medium as part of the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs sculptures on the Tertiary Island of the Crystal Palace Park, United Kingdom

Palaeotherium magnum, Palaeotherium medium and "Plagiolophus minus" (= Plagiolophus) are notably depicted in the forms of one sculpture representing each species in the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs attraction in the Crystal Palace Park in the United Kingdom, open to the public since 1854 and constructed by English sculptor Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins. The original large-sized P. magnum sculpture was lost at some point after 1958 and was replaced by a new replicated model in 2023. The other two palaeothere statues in the park represent the medium-sized P. medium and the small-sized "P. minus" (= Plagiolophus minor). Both the large P. magnum and P. medium were posed in standing positions whereas the smallest sitting statue was made to represent "P. minus". The models' resemblances to tapirs reflected early perceptions that the palaeothere species resembled them in body plan appearances. Despite this, the sculptures differ from living tapirs in several ways, such as shorter plus taller faces, higher eye positions, slender legs, longer tails, and the presence of three toes on the forelimbs unlike the four toes of the forelimbs of tapirs.[17][18]

Of the three sculptures, P. medium most closely resembles a tapir, and it has remained mostly intact but suffered from damages that were eventually repaired. P. medium was depicted as having durable skin and a slender face with a trunk, representing archaic perceptions that it was a slow animal that lived in closed habitats. The original P. magnum sculpture was last known from a 1958 photograph of it that reveals that it was the largest sculpture of the three species and that it had a highly robust form with large and deep eyes, a proportionally large head, bulky legs, and a muscular-looking body plan. The trunk of the model appears to start from the upper section of the skull and descends down to the lower lip. The overall anatomy of the sculpture appears to have been based off of elephants compared to the other two palaeothere statues.[18]

Palaeotherium proved to be a significant find to the field of palaeontology in multiple other aspects. For one, both the skeletal reconstruction drawing and the life restoration in Cuvier's works were incorporated into textbooks and handbooks around the world up to the 20th century.[19] The genus was also incorporated into old orthogenesis models of the evolution of the horse theory as early as 1851 by British biologist Richard Owen and followed by other 19th century European naturalists such as Jean Albert Gaudry and Vladimir Kovalevsky.[20]

Later 19th century taxonomy[edit]

Illustrations of the fossil skulls (left) and limbs (right) of multiple palaeothere species including those of Palaeotherium

Throughout much of the 19th century, many species were classified under Palaeotherium, some of which were eventually reclassified under different genera.[21] For instance, "P." aurelianense was reclassified to its own genus Anchitherium by Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer in 1844. In an 1839–1864 osteography, the French naturalist Henri Marie Ducrotay de Blainville relisted "P." tapiroides, "P." buxovillanum and "P." occitanicum as species belonging to Lophiodon,[22] but the latter two were eventually reclassified to Paralophiodon and Lophiaspis, respectively in the 20th century.[23][24] In 1862, Swiss zoologist Ludwig Ruetimeyer defined the previously recognized genera Plagiolophus and Propalaeotherium as distinct from Palaeotherium and containing the species P. minor and P. isselanum, respectively.[25]

In 1853, Pomel erected the species P. duvali based on fossil limbs that he thought to have been less stocky compared to those of P. curtum.[26] In an 1839–1864 osteography, Blainville listed Palaeotherium species previously recognized by other taxonomists and erected P. girondicum.[22] In 1863, the French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Noulet created the species P. castrense based on an incomplete mandible from the commune of Viviers-lès-Montagnes, where it was later studied in Castres.[27] In 1869, Pictet and Humbert erected the species Plagiolophus siderolithicus using fossil molars from a museum collection whose form is similar to that of P. minor but differs mainly by the dimensions.[28] The same year, German palaeontologist Oscar Fraas erected P. suevicum based on teeth that he thought to have distinct enamel.[29] Gervais in 1875 described fossil bones and teeth from the French commune of Dampleux, noting that the particular species was smaller than others classified to Palaeotherium and that the dental measurements were similar to those of Plagiolophus minor. He assigned the fossils to the newly erected species P. eocaenum.[30]

Palaeotherium skeletons[edit]

Illustrations of P. magnum skeletons from Vitry-sur-Seine (left) and Mormoiron (right)

For much of paleontological history, Palaeotherium was not known by any complete skeleton since its initial description by Cuvier.[31] This changed when in 1873, the French geologist Gaston Casimir Vasseur uncovered the first complete skeleton of P. magnum from a gypsum quarry in the commune of Vitry-sur-Seine.[32] The quarry was owned by the civil engineer Fuchs, who donated the skeleton to the National Museum of Natural History, France.[33][34] The skeleton was first described by Gervais in an academic journal the same year, who noted that it allows for more accurate confirmations of the species' anatomical traits. He pointed out that the skeleton had a skull measures 0.5 m (1 ft 8 in) long, a longer neck than previously expected, and a less stocky build compared to tapirs and rhinoceroses. The naturalist said that the extraction process was difficult but completed by multiple skillful workers.[33] Since then, it has been displayed at the Gallery of Paleontology and Comparative Anatomy exhibit of the museum, where it had been noted as an important and famous component of the gallery to the modern day.[34][32]

During the 20th century, a second complete skeleton of P. magnum was excavated from the plasters within the French commune of Mormoiron. It was sent to the geological department of the University of Lyon and described after preparation by the Austrian geologist Frédéric Roman in 1922. Roman depicted a drawing of a reconstruction of the skeleton of P. magnum based on the Mormoiron skeleton within his 1922 monography. According to Austrian palaeontologist Othenio Abel in 1924, it was the most complete skeleton of Palaeotherium to have been found and amongst the most complete of early Cenozoic mammal skeletons, missing only a few ribs and a left femur.[31][19]

20th century revisions[edit]

Illustrations of the dentition of P. curtum and P. eocaenum (left) and a reconstructed skull of P. lautricense (right)

In 1904, Swiss palaeontologist Hans Georg Stehlin first created the species name P. lautricense based on an upper jaw from a collection at the Muséum de Toulouse that originated from sandstone deposits at Castres. He also wrote about two somewhat crushed skulls of the species, producing a sketched reconstruction of it based on the first one.[35] In his monography for palaeotheres, published the same year, Stehlin considered most species within Palaeotherium to be potentially valid and created more of them, but he noted that most taxonomists were cautious invalidating species erected by Cuvier. Stehlin also revised P. girondicum as P. magnum var. girondicum, or P. magnum girondicum. He established the subspecies name P. curtum var. perrealense, or P. curtum perrealense, based on jaw fragments from La Débruge. He erected P. Mühlbergi based on dental material in the Swiss municipality of Obergösgen that Ruetimeyer examined back in 1862. He also stated that the recent excavations at Mormont from Natural History Museum of Basel had yielded fossils that he classified along with a mandible identified by Pictert in 1869 under the new species name P. Renevieri. Finally, he also determined that an additional species Palaeotherium Rütimeyeri, which he described as having primitive premolars, was present in the municipality of Egerkingen.[36]

Lower jaw of P. crassum from the French locality of La Débruge with a mostly complete dental set

In 1917, French palaeontologist Charles Depéret recognized two additional species of Palaeotherium called P. Euzetense and P. Stehlini.[37] German palaeontologist Wilhelm Otto Dietrich named the German species P. Kleini in 1922, basing it off of fossils from the locality of Mähringen and mentioning that it would have been the size of P. curtum and P. Heimi.[38]

In 1968, upcoming German palaeontologist Jens Lorenz Franzen, then a graduate student, made major revisions of Palaeotherium within his dissertation. He synonymized or rendered dubious statuses many species of Palaeotherium that were erected throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, including those named by Cuvier. He also erected P. pomeli using fossils from a locality in Castres and reclassified "Plagiolophus" siderolithicum into Palaeotherium. Furthermore, Franzen converted some species into subspecies, namely P. magnum girondicum, P. magnum stehlini, P. medium suevicum, and P. medium euzetense. In addition, he named the following subspecies that he named in his thesis: P. castrense robiacense, P. crassum robustum, P. curtum villerealense, P. curtum frohnstettense, P. muehlbergi praecursum, and P. duvali priscum. Not all species within Palaeotherium had any recognized subspecies in them.[21]

In 1975, Spanish palaeontologist María Lourdes Casanovas-Cladellas erected the species P. crusafonti from a left maxilla with dentition from the Spanish site of Roc de Santa.[39] In 1980, both she and José-Vicente Santafé Llopis established the second Iberian species P. franzeni, taking into account morphological differences of the dental fossils from the Spanish municipality of Sossís.[40] In 1985, the French palaeontologist Jean-Albert Remy named a subspecies P. muehlbergi thaleri in honor of fellow palaeontologist Louis Thaler, having documented that its fossils were from the commune of Saint-Étienne-de-l'Olm and that both the holotype and paratype each consist of a skull with a mandible.[41]

In 1991, Casanovas-Cladellas and Santafé Llopis erected P. llamaquiquense from partial jaw material from the Spanish locality of Llamaquique in the city of Oviedo, where the name derived from.[42] The next year in 1992, Remy proposed the creation of two subgenera of Palaeotherium based on cranial characteristics. The first subgenus he listed was Palaeotherium, which includes the type species P. magnum along with P. medium, P. crassum, P. curtum, P. castrense, P. siderolithicum, and P. muehlbergi. The second subgenus name that he proposed was Franzenitherium, which includes the type species P. lautricense plus P. duvali and was named in honor of Franzen's review of Palaeotherium.[43] The Spanish palaeontologist Miguel Ángel Cuesta Ruiz-Colmenares established the species P. giganteum using dentition from the Mazaterón site in the Duero Basin in 1993, considering it to be the largest species of Palaeotherium known.[44] In 1998, Casanovas-Cladellas et al. formally recognized P. crassum sossissense from a fragmented right maxilla with dentition from Sossís in Spain. They also invalidated the previously named P. franzeni due to reassigning the material to P. magnum stehlini.[45]

Classification[edit]

Portrait of Georges Cuvier, the French naturalist who described Palaeotherium and Anoplotherium in 1804

Palaeotherium is the type genus of the Palaeotheriidae, largely considered to be one of two major hippomorph families in the superfamily Equoidea, the other being the Equidae. Alternatively, some authors have proposed that equids are more closely related to the Tapiromorpha than to the Palaeotheriidae. It is also usually thought to consist of two families, the Palaeotheriinae and Pachynolophinae; not all authors agree on the latter as a palaeotheriid subfamily, however.[46] Some authors have also considered the Plagiolophinae to be a separate subfamily, while others group its genera into the Palaeotheriinae.[47] The geographic range of the palaeotheres were in contrast to equids, which are generally thought to have been an endemic radiation in North America. Some of the most basal equoids of the European landmass are of uncertain affinities, with some genera being thought to potentially belong to the Equidae.[48] Palaeotheriids are well-known for having lived in western Europe during much of the Palaeogene but were also present in eastern Europe, possibly the Middle East, and, in the case of pachynolophines (or pachynolophs), Asia.[46][47]

The Perissodactyla makes its earliest known appearance in the European landmass in MP7 of the Mammal Palaeogene zones. During the temporal unit, many genera of basal equoids such as Hyracotherium, Pliolophus, Cymbalophus, and Hallensia made their first appearances there. A majority of the genera persisted to the MP8-MP10 units, and "pachynolophines" (probably true palaeotheres) such as Propalaeotherium and Orolophus arose by MP10.[48][49] The MP13 unit saw the appearances of later pachynolophines such as Pachynolophus and Anchilophus along with definite records of the first palaeotheriines such as Palaeotherium and Paraplagiolophus.[50] The palaeotheriine Plagiolophus has been suggested to have potentially made an appearance by MP12. It was by MP14 that the subfamily proceeded to diversify,[51] and the plagiolophines were generally replaced but still reached the late Eocene. In addition to more widespread palaeothere genera such as Plagiolophus, Palaeotherium, and Leptolophus, some of their species reaching medium to large sizes, various other palaeothere genera that were endemic to the Iberian penninsula, such as Cantabrotherium, Franzenium and Iberolophus, appeared by the middle Eocene.[50]

The phylogenetic tree for several members of the family Palaeotheriidae within the order Perissodactyla (including three outgroups) as created by Remy in 2017 and followed by Remy et al. in 2019 is defined below:[52][51]

As shown in the above phylogeny, the Palaeotheriidae is defined as a monophyletic clade, meaning that it did not leave any derived descendant groups in its evolutionary history. Hyracotherium sensu stricto (in a strict sense) is defined as amongst the first offshoots of the family and a member of the Pachynolophinae. "H." remyi, formerly part of the now-invalid genus Propachynolophus, is defined as a sister taxon to more derived palaeotheriids. Both Pachynolophus and Lophiotherium, defined as pachynolophines, are defined as monophyletic genera. The other pachynolophines Eurohippus and Propalaeotherium consistute a paraphyletic clade in relation to members of the derived and monophyletic subfamily Palaeotheriinae (Leptolophus, Plagiolophus, and Palaeotherium), thus making Pachynolophinae a paraphyletic subfamily clade.[52]

List of lineages[edit]

Since 1968, many species of Palaeotherium have multiple defined subspecies due to taxonomic revisions conducted by Franzen involving new species plus subspecies erections and conversions of some species into subspecies that were accepted by subsequent authors. From his dissertation was he able to justify the subspecies by proof of various intraspecific variations.[21][53] The following table defines the species and subspecies of Palaeotherium and additional information about them:

Comparative table of Palaeotherium lineages[54][43][55][56]
Lineage Proposed subgenus MP unit(s) Author(s) of taxon Taxon publication year
P. castrense castrense Palaeotherium 14, 16 Noulet 1863
P. castrense robiacense Palaeotherium 16 Franzen 1968
P. crassum sossisense Palaeotherium 17 Casanovas-Cladellas, Checa, and Santafé Llopis 1998
P. crassum crassum Palaeotherium 19 Cuvier 1805
P. crusafonti Incertae sedis 17 Casanovas-Cladellas 1975
P. curtum villerealense Palaeotherium 17, 18 Franzen 1968
P. curtum curtum Palaeotherium 19 Cuvier 1812
P. curtum frohnstettense Palaeotherium 20 Franzen 1968
P. duvali priscum Franzenitherium 17 Franzen 1968
P. duvali duvali Franzenitherium 19 Pomel 1853
P. eocaenum Incertae sedis 13, 14 Gervais 1875
P. giganteum Incertae sedis 16 Cuesta 1993
P. lautricense Franzenitherium 16 Stehlin 1904
P. llamaquiquense Incertae sedis 16 Casanovas-Cladellas & Santafé Llopis 1991
P. magnum stehlini Palaeotherium 17 Depéret 1917
P. magnum girondicum Palaeotherium 18 Blainville 1846
P. magnum magnum Palaeotherium 19, 20 Cuvier 1804
P. medium euzetense Palaeotherium 17 Depéret 1917
P. medium perrealense Palaeotherium 18 Stehlin 1904
P. medium medium Palaeotherium 19 Cuvier 1804
P. medium suevicum Palaeotherium 20, 21 Fraas 1869
P. muehlbergi praecursum Palaeotherium 17 Franzen 1968
P. muehlbergi thaleri Palaeotherium 18 Remy 1985
P. muehlbergi muehlbergi Palaeotherium 19, 20 Stehlin 1904
P. pomeli Incertae sedis 16 Franzen 1968
P. renevieri Incertae sedis 19 Stehlin 1904
P. ruetimeyeri Incertae sedis 14, 16 Stehlin 1904
P. siderolithicum Palaeotherium 16, 17, 18, 19 Pictet & Humbert 1869

Description[edit]

Skull[edit]

Montmartre skulls of P. medium (left) and P. curtum (right), National Museum of Natural History, France

The Palaeotheriidae is diagnosed in part as generally having orbits that are wide open in the back area and are located in the middle of the skull or in a slight frontal area of it. The nasal bones are slightly extensive to very extensive in depth. Palaeotherium is characterized as having calvaria that range in base length from 150 mm (5.9 in) to 520 mm (20 in) depending on the species. The pterygoid crest, which is located on the pterygoid processes of the sphenoid bone, does not cover the optic foramen, which is separated from other cranial cavities at the temporal fossa. The zygomatic process of the squamosal bone is elongated and extends to the maxilla at a back angle of the orbit. The genus is also diagnosed by the presence of an anastomosis (anatomical connection between two passageways) roughly at the sphenoid bone and prominent temporalis muscle developments.[21][43]

According to Remy, the subgenus Palaeotherium is the more specialized one of the two, characterized by the orbit being located more in front of the skull's middle length. The optic foramen is separated by a bony wall, and there are two optic canals in total. The cranium is constricted in its front area behind the postorbital processes and close to the suture for the frontal bone and parietal bone. The other subgenus Franzenitherium in comparison has more generalized skull traits, its orbit being aligned within the middle length of the head. It has a front constriction of the cranium near the postorbital processes, and the optic foramen crosses through the skull from one side to the other. Not all species are placed in any subgenus due to having inadequate skull evidence for further analyses.[43]

Montmartre skulls of P. magnum (left) and P. crassum (right), National Museum of Natural History, France

The height and weight proportions of the skull of Palaeotherium are roughly equivalent with those of other taxa within the Equoidea. In comparison to other equoids where the skull's maximum width extends above the front root of the parallel zygomatic arches, those of Palaeotherium and most other palaeotheres (except Leptolophus) extend back to the joint of the squamosal bone and mandible. Unlike that of Plagiolophus, the maxillary hiatus, or an opening of the maxillary sinus, in Palaeotherium is wide, diamond-shaped, and has oblique back edges. Palaeotherium differs from most other palaeotheres by the nasal opening stretching up to the P3 tooth at minimum (noticeable in P. duvali and P. siderolithicum) or up to the front edge of the orbit above M3 in the case of P. magnum. Similar to other palaeotheres, the back process (tissue projection) of the premaxilla is reduced, but its morphology can vary. The maxilla can extend to the nasal opening but can also vary in proportions. While the shapes and proportions of the nasal bones vary by species, they extend beyond P1 in adults and sometimes even the canine like in equines. The nasomaxillary suture, which unites the maxilla and nasal bones, is short and strongly curved.[43]

The jugal bone and lacrimal bone, both located in front of the orbit, are weak in development. The latter bone is elongated in its back and touches the posterolateral process of the nasal bones. Members of the Equoidea have relatively shortened front areas of the face. The orbits of Palaeotherium, unlike those of other equoids, are proportionally smaller and are situated somewhat in front of the skull's mid-length area; they might be more forwards in the case of P. medium. Similar to other Palaeogene equoids, the front edge of the orbit is aligned with M1 or M2 while the back area is wide. In most species, the infraorbital foramen in adults is located above P4 or M1; in P. curtum frohnstettense, it extends to above M2. Each zygomatic arch is wide, and its uneven narrowing in the front area under the orbit may be the result of either species traits or sexual differentiation. The squamosal process of the postorbital is elongated and reaches the maxilla at a back angle of the orbital floor, the roof of the maxillary sinus. The orbit is shallow within its front area, its back opening of the infraorbital canal having a small distance of 10 mm (0.39 in) to 15 mm (0.59 in). The canal itself is smaller than those of most other palaeotheriines except for that of Leptolophus, and it has a tendency to shorten in later species.[43]

Cranium of P. curtum (left) and mandible of P. medium (right), National Museum of Natural History, France

The side wall of the snout is usually concave but may be interrupted by other local concavities that are normally poorly distinguished. The palatine bone has a well-developed front area, which in the case of P. curtum villerealense can rise near the orbit's top. The sphenopalatine foramen, large and oval-shaped, is above the back of M4. The optic canal is small, has a primitive form of opening in front of the pterygoid crest, and is separated from it by a thick bony wall except in the cases of P. lautricense and P. duvali. Whereas there are two optic canals in most species that are nearly parallel of each other and separate in the end, there is only one long one in P. lautricense and possibly P. duvali. The sphenoid bone's wings are well-developed in their backs, and a suture for the parietal and sphenoid bones separates the frontal bone from the squamosal bone. The postorbital processes of the frontal bone are not very elongated. The cranial vault is broad, domed, and wider than the overall skull. The maximum front narrowing of the cranium, with the exceptions of those of P. lautricense and P. duvali, is set far back to roughly where the frontoparietal suture occurs. The skull's top peaks at the far back area, although this is not observed in P. lautricense. The sagittal crest can be prominent and depends on the age and sex of the individual for development. The nuchal crest, where the neck attaches to the head, is prominent and, except in P. lautricense, extends outwards plus backwards past the occipital condyles. The temporal fossae are large but vary in proportion. In Palaeotherium and not Plagiolophus, the overall basicranium's axis is thick plus wide.[43]

The horizontal ramus of the mandible is overall thick plus tall and has an elongated mandibular symphysis, but the width and lower area morphology vary by species. It is wide in both the front and back areas and low compared to equines. The joint for the squamosal and mandible of Palaeotherium is low compared to those of Plagiolophus and Leptolophus. The angular process, located above the angle of the mandible, is blocked from further expansion by the mandibular notch and is well-developed in its rear like in Palaeogene equids. The coronoid process of the mandible, an upper eminence, is both broad in the front plus back and stocky. The condyloid process, an upper process of the mandible, is transversely elongated and cylindrical in shape. Both the zygomatico-mandibular fossa and pterygoid fossa are prominent.[43]

Dentition[edit]

P. muehlberigi dentition, The Paleontological Collection of the University of Tübingen

Derived palaeotheres are generally diagnosed as having selenolophodont upper molars and selenodont lower molars that are mesodont, or medium-crowned, in height. The canines strongly protrude and are separated from the premolars by medium to long diastemata and from the incisors by short ones in both the upper and lower dentition. The other teeth are paired closely with each other in both the upper and lower rows.[21] The dental formula of Palaeotherium is 3.1.4.33.1.4.3 for a total of 44 teeth, consistent with the primitive dental formula for early-middle Palaeogene placental mammals.[57][58] The post-canine diastemata of Palaeotherium are small. The premolars and preceding deciduous teeth both tend to have molarized forms and have newly developing hypocone cusps on them. The mesostyle cusp present in the molars thicken from M1 to M3. The lingual lobes (or divisions) in the upper molars are closely aligned with the ectolophs (crests or ridges of upper molar teeth).[59] The ectolophs themselves are W-shaped, being made up of two articulated crescents.[57]

The incisors are shovel-shaped and, like in modern horses, are used for chewing at right angles in relation to their longitudinal axes. They have no cutting functions but instead are used for grasping food akin to how tweezers grasp items. The canines are proportionally large-sized and are dagger-shaped. They were probably not used for cutting or chewing food given how they are oriented. Instead, they were probably used for biting functions for self-defense and sexual selection.[60]

P. ruetimeyeri dentition, Goldfuß-Museum at the University of Bonn

The decreased lengths of postcanine diastemata in Palaeotherium and the equid subfamily Anchitheriinae may be correlated with increases in body size. The trend may be due to the necessity to improve chewing performances through molarization and proportional size increases of the premolars and the enlargements of the molar row, the latter trend of which may play a role in decreasing diastamata lengths.[61] Early species such as P. castrense have nearly absent postcanine diastemata. In later species, the postcanine diastemata can vary from shortened such as in P. crassum and P. curtum to elongated like in P. medium and P. magnum.[62] The separation of cheek teeth from the incisors and canines attests to their independent and specific chewing functions.[60] The distance from the canine to the second premolar is up to twenty percent (twenty-five percent in the case of P. magnum) of the total length of the second premolar to third molar dental row.[43]

The non-molarized premolars are composed of four to five cusps (one to two external, two intermediate, and one internal) while the molarized premolars and molars have six cusps (two external, two intermediate, and two internal). The upper molars are medium-crowned (shorter than those of modern equids) and have ectolophs that are about twice the height of the inner cusps and curve into a W shape. The lower molarized premolars and molars are about half as wide as their upper counterparts. The lower cheek teeth's occlusal surfaces have patterns resembling two mesiodistal crescents with an outwards convex side. M3 has a hook-shaped and curved hypoconulid cusp. The non-molarized premolars have talonids (crushing regions of cheek teeth) that are only semi-developed as elongated ridges.[60]

P. magnum dentition, Teylers Museum

The lingual side (front side in relation to the mouth) of the upper molars are at about the same heights at different stages of the teeth resulting from shifting stages in chewing. On the other hand, in regard to chewing stages, the crowns on the buccal side of the upper molars increase in height and move forward. In the lower molars, the crowns instead shift the opposite way towards the buccal side (back side). This is due to the chewing function being emphasized on the buccal side of the upper molars for shearing through food vertically and the lingual side of the lower molars for slowly chewing through food in a horizontal manner. A Palaeotherium individual would have moved its lower jaw in a circular movement, pushing forward the upper molars in a manner of occlusion during and after eruption, especially at their buccal side. The upper molars go through an abrasion process that causes their outer part of their crowns to curve. This ensures that the distance from the front cutting edge of the ectolophs to the axis of rotation remains the same.[60]

Compared to the earlier-appearing pachynolophines, the palaeotheriines have more molarized deciduous premolars. For instance, Stehlin illustrated a Mormont fossil of P. renevieri with erupted dP1-dP4 plus an unerupted M1. dP1 appears small and triangular in shape with two buccal cusps (paracone and metacone cusps) and a smaller posterolingual cusp. dP2-dP4, in comparison, are molariform in shape and have four major cusps. Stehlin theorized that the dP1 tooth is unreplaced by any adult P1 due to the similar sizes of the milk tooth to the adult tooth. A juvenile skull of P. magnum with deciduous premolars was described by Remy in 1985, who noted their molarized forms. As is the case for the juvenile P. renevieri, the dP1 of the juvenile P. magnum is triangular in shape and has two close buccal cusps plus a smaller posterolingual cusp. It also shares the trait of molariform, four-cusped dP2-dP4. While Remy proposed that an adult P1 had already replaced its deciduous counterpart in P. magnum at an early age, there is no strong evidence to support his claim.[36][41][63]

Vertebrae and ribs[edit]

P. magnum skeleton from Vitry-sur-Seine, NMNH, France

The overall postcranial anatomy of Palaeotherium is best known from a skeleton of P. magnum uncovered from Mormoiron. Within the vertebral column are seven large-sized cervical vertebrae total for a series of C1-C7, typical of most mammals. In total, they measure 65 cm (26 in) long within the individual skeleton. The atlas (C1) was trapezoidal and closely resembled those of equids, but it differed from theirs in its transverse processes having less rounded outlines. The spiny process of the atlas of Palaeotherium is elongated and thin compared to those of horses. The proceeding cervical vertebrae, C2-C4, are wider than they are long and appear roughly quadrangular in shape. Their lateral process are proportionately wider than in horses but also decrease in length gradually from the front to the back. C7 has a well-pronounced spinous process more akin to tapirs than horses.[31] Based on the anatomy of the cervical vertebrae, the neck of P. magnum is long and muscular but not low like in tapirs.[19]

There are also 17 thoracic vertebrae, one vertebra less than in horses and two less than in tapirs, that measure 77 cm (30 in) long in total. The first ten vertebrae, T1-T10, are about equal in individual lengths with each other but are slightly shorter than the last seven, T11-T17. The first thoracic vertebrae have strong spinous processes with few variations, but their lengths decrease as seen in T5-T6. The thoracic vertebrae generally have rectangular and elongated shapes, differing from the triangular and sequentially shorter spinous processes in horses. The arrangements of the thoracic vertebrae reveal that the withers (or scapula ridges) of P. magnum are lower than a horse's but higher than a tapir's.[31]

Like horses, P. magnum also has six lumbar vertebrae measuring 65 mm (2.6 in) long, one more vertebra than that of donkeys, zebras, and tapirs. All the vertebrae have equal lengths and, especially L3, have strong lateral processes that furrow toward the back, widen to a third of their total lengths, slightly narrow, and then finally swell in the end. They differ from the nearly straight lateral process shapes of equids. The lumbar vertebrae portion of Palaeotherium was probably wider than that of the horse.[31]

Drawing of a reconstructed skeleton of P. magnum based on that from Mormoiron, 1922

The sacrum, connected from its back underneath the pelvis, is triangular similar to that of the Equidae but is slightly wider in its front area. It appears to compose of six sacral vertebrae total. The final region of the vertebral column is composed of fifteen caudal vertebrae that compose the tail, although there is the possibility that one to two additional ones are hidden by the pelvis. The caudal vertebrae, especially in C5-C11, are slender due to their lengths being twice their widths. The first four, however, have roughly equal lengths and widths. The tail, in terms of length and vertebrae shape, is similar to that of equids. The skeleton's tail measures 35 cm (14 in) long, the first four vertebrae being 11 cm (4.3 in) long.[31]

Although the Mormoiron skeleton has has nineteen complete or fragmented ribs, P. magnum would have had thirty-four total based on the number of thoracic vertebrae. Like in equids, the front ribs are strong and flattened. One rib between the forelimbs, probably articulated at T10, measures 49 cm (19 in) long, suggesting that the rib cage size is larger than those of horses and approximate to those of modern rhinoceroses. The back portion of the thorax would have been wider than in horses and roughly comparable to those of tapirs and rhinoceroses but never being as long as those of the latter.[31] The ribs sharing space with the sternum do not directly connect to it but are instead separated from it. The sternum was approximately the same size as the thorax. Contrary to the 1922 reconstruction by Roman, there is no evidence that the rib cage had a fan-shaped spread.[19]

Limbs[edit]

Front foot of P. crassum, Naturalis Biodiversity Center

The Palaeotheriidae includes both the primitive members with tetradactyl (four-toed) forelimbs plus tridactyl (three-toed) hindlimbs (Propalaeotherium) and more derived members with tridactyl forelimbs plus hindlimbs (Palaeotherium, Plagiolophus). Most species of Palaeotherium, most notably P. medium, P. magnum, P. crassum, P. curtum, and P. muehlbergi, have tridactyl limbs. It is unclear as to whether or not P. eocaenum is tetradactyl based on a possible manus tentatively assigned to it.[21][64] Both the manus and pes bones are short plus robust. The side digits are capable of reaching the ground and are not much more slender than the middle one.[57] While previous studies have suggested that modern tapirs serve as analogues for European perissodactyls of the Eocene, a 2020 study by Jame A. MacLaren and Sandra Naewelaerts suggested that no one species of tapir serves as an analogue for any of the extinct species.[64] P. medium has a more unique foot morphology compared to other Palaeotherium species due to narrower plus higher feet and stretched metapodial bones.[65] The tridactyl foot morphology with all three digits being functional suggests digitigrade locomotion.[47]

In P. magnum, the morphology of the scapula, which articulates with the humerus, is similar to those in modern equids, giving off a narrow appearance due to its length being twice its width. Its highest point aligns with the transverse processes of the front thoracic vertebrae.[19] It is elongated, nearly rectangular in shape, and slightly narrow at its base. Its glenoid fossa is concave plus shallow whereas its coracoid process articulates underneath the vertebral column. Compared to equids, the scapula, while similar, is more triangular while its glenoid fossa is deeper and more rounded.[31]

The humerus' head articulates with the glenoid cavity of a scapula while its lower end connects with the forearm's bones. The head is slightly oblique, making it more similar to those of rhinoceroses than those of tapirs. The greater tubercle of the humerus appears long and narrow as in tapirs. The deltoid tuberosity is located about halfway along the humerus' length, slightly lower than in Anchitherium and modern horses.[31] The humerus of P. medium is more slender. The lips of its trochlea (articular surface of the elbow joint) has a larger slope. The bicipital groove of the humerus, which separates the greater tubercle and lesser tubercle, is deep. The morphology of the humerus of P. medium implies more cursorial adaptations.[66]

P. medium foot bones, MNHM, France

In P. magnum, the forearm, consisting of the radius and ulna, is 20% larger than the humerus. In comparison, tapirs have slightly longer humeri compared to the radius and ulna, and the forearm of horses are 25% larger than their humeri. The radius, articulated with the humerus and carpal bones, is slightly arched and has a roughly circular front end. The upper part of the radius is fused with the upper ulna. Its general shape appears similar to those of tapirs but is slightly thinner and has less prominent extremities. The ulna is well-developed and lengthy, being as strong as the radius and having a less pronounced back curvature compared to tapirs and horses. Its olecranon process is enlarged but is only slightly hollow in its internal face.[31]

The palaeotheriines Palaeotherium and Plagiolophus, despite being known as tridactyl genera, display large morphological diversity of the forelimb.[64] The former has long plus narrow carpals, its metacarpal bones being close in length to each other plus developing into wide ungual phalanges at their ends and the middle one being slightly more robust.[57] Palaeotherium has an exceptional amount of shape variation displayed in its third metacarpal and varies in manus dimensions by species with known limb remains. P. curtum has very robust forelimb bones including a stocky and stocky manus, which suggests that it was stocky in build. P. magnum and P. crassum are suggested to have forelimbs that to at least some level resemble those of tapirs, especially the mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque). The forelimb morphology of P. magnum rather than P. crassum may more closely resemble those of tapirs to the more gracile forms of the radius and metacarpals in the latter. P. medium, along with Plagiolophus spp, appear to be the most cursorial palaeotheres due to their elongated and gracile metacarpals; those of P. medium and Plagiolophus are of approximately equal proportional lengths.[64]

In the Mormoiron skeleton, the femur is strong and stocky, its upper (or proximal) end being enlarged and having a large trochanter (or femoral tubercle) that does not extend beyond the size of the femoral head. On the external face of the bone, here is a third trochanter that is well-developed, triangular in shape, and barely curved forward. Its position is slightly more centred compared to that of P. medium. The bone narrows slightly after the third trochanter then swells quickly.[31]

The tibia, like other limb bones, is strong and thick in build, its front crest reaching the midlength of the bone. It hosts a shallow front fossa for the patella, differing from the deeper ones of Anchitherium and Equus. Its joint end for the astragalus is somewhat oblique, and the tibia's malleolus is less developed compared to the aforementioned equids. The fibula is slender in form and fused to the tibia. It is proportionally wider in P. magnum than in P. crassum and P. medium, the latter two species of which have lesser-developed ones.[31]

Palaeotherium has a straighter and less concave trochlea of the astragalus than in Plagiolophus.[67] The calcaneum is semirectangular in shape and is slightly wide on its back end. The cuboid bone is high and narrow similar to that in Anchitherium. As in the metacarpal bones, the middle metatarsal bone (finger III) is larger and more well-developed than the others. Finger IV of the hind foot of P. magnum appears slightly arched and is slightly longer than finger II.[31]

Footprints[edit]

Palaeotheriids are known from footprint tracks assigned to ichnotaxa, among them being the ichnogenus Palaeotheriipus, named by the palaeontologist Paul Ellenberger in 1980 and suggested to have belonged to Palaeotherium. The ichnogenus, described from the department of Gard in France, is defined as having been produced by large-sized perissodactyls, of which the middle toe imprint is deep while the two other outer toes are less pitted. The three toes have rounded nail ends based on the shape of the footprints. The ichonotaxon's characteristics were said by Ellenberger to correspond with those of P. medium or P. cf. crassum.[68] The ichnogenus is diagnosed as being a very short and tridactyl footprint in which the outer digits II and IV are flat and less pitted than digit III. It differs from another palaeothere footprint ichnogenus Plagiolophustipus, suggested to have been made by Plagiolophus, by the presence of smaller and broader digits. Lophiopus, likely produced by Lophiodon, differs by smaller digit sizes and divergent outer digit imprints while Rhinoceripeda, attributed to the Rhinocerotidae, is oval-shaped and has three or five digits.[69] Palaeotheriipus is known from both France and Iran whereas Plagiolophustipus is currently known from Spain.[70]

The type ichnospecies is Palaeotheriipus similimedius from the lacustrine limestone of the French commune of Garrigues-Sainte-Eulalie in the department of Gard. The footprint in question measures 115 mm (4.5 in) long and 140 mm (5.5 in) wide; it is therefore wider than it is long. The three fingers diverge widely from each other in angles of at least 50°. The hoof of finger III appears to be wider than those of the outer toes. Ellenberger suggested that the ichnospecies most closely corresponds with either P. medium euzetense or P. medium perrealense due to the more flexible fingers. Fingers II and IV measure approximately 50 mm (2.0 in) long, and the length of finger IV is 65 mm (2.6 in).[68]

A second ichnospecies from Iran attributed to Palaeotheriipus brings the possibility that palaeotheres could have extended in geographical range to the region by the middle to late Eocene.[47] It was named P. sarjeanti after William A. S. Sarjeant and was found in eastern Iran. The ichnospecies is diagnosed as being large-sized perissodactyl footprints each with a finger III that is relatively round, lesser-developed, and is broader and longer than outer fingers II and IV, which nearly share the same size and shape. The manus is less elongated than the pes. The footprint for the pes measures 295 mm (11.6 in) in length and 240 mm (9.4 in) in width, with the lengths of finger II measuring 25 mm (0.98 in), digit III being 65 mm (2.6 in), and finger IV measuring 35 mm (1.4 in). In comparison, the footprint for the manus measures 200 mm (7.9 in) long and 240 mm (9.4 in) wide, the only clearly discernable digit, finger III, measuring 25 mm (0.98 in) long.[71]

Additional footprints from the d’Apt-Forcalquier basin in France, dated to the middle Eocene and described first by G. Bessonat et al. in 1969, are recorded to be larger than the footprints of P. similimedius, measuring 170 mm (6.7 in) long and 160 mm (6.3 in) wide. Finger II measures 80 mm (3.1 in) long, finger III is 75 mm (3.0 in) in length, and that of finger IV is 85 mm (3.3 in). They are referred to the species P. magnum.[71]

Size[edit]

Palaeotherium is characterized by the inclusion of small to large-sized species, the skull base length ranging from 150 mm (5.9 in) to 520 mm (20 in) depending on the species. The length of the P2 to M3 dental row ranges from 64 mm (2.5 in) long in the smallest species P. lautricense to 217 mm (8.5 in) long in the largest species P. giganteum.[59] That of P. magnum is not far behind the latter with the one dental set measuring 208.6 mm (8.21 in) in length,[44] and it was previously considered the largest species of Palaeotherium.[21]

Palaeobiology[edit]

Palaeoecology[edit]

Extinction[edit]

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ de Lamanon, Robert de Paul (1782). "Description de divers fossiles trouvés dans les carrières de Montmartre près Paris, & vues générales sur la formation des pierres gypseuses". Introduction aux Observations sur la Physique, sur l'Histoire Naturelle et sur les Arts. 19: 173–194.
  2. ^ a b c d Belhoste, Bruno (2017). "Chapter 10: From Quarry to Paper. Cuvier's Three Epistemological Cultures". In Chemla, Karine; Keller, Evelyn Fox (eds.). Cultures without Culturalism: The Making of Scientific Knowledge. Duke University Press. pp. 250–277.
  3. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1798). "Extrait d'un Mémoire sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes". Bulletin des sciences par la Société Philomathique. 18: 137–139.
  4. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1798). "Sur les ossemens qui se trouvent dans le gypse de Montmartre". Bulletin des sciences par la Société Philomathique. 20: 154–155.
  5. ^ a b Cuvier, Georges (1804). "Sur les espèces d'animaux dont proviennent les os fossiles répandus dans la pierre à plâtre des environs de Paris". Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (in French). 3: 275–303.
  6. ^ Rudwick, Martin J. S. (2022). "Georges Cuvier's appeal for international collaboration, 1800". History of Geology. 46 (1): 117–125. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2022/022002. S2CID 246893918.
  7. ^ Roberts, George (1839). An etymological and explanatory dictionary of the terms and language of geology. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans. p. 8. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  8. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1804). "Suite des Recherches: Sur les espèces d'animaux dont proviennent les os fossiles répandus dans la pierre à plâtre des environs de Paris". Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (in French). 3: 364–387. Archived from the original on 2023-07-27. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  9. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1804). "Suite des Recherches: Suite de recherches sur les os fossiles de la pierre à plâtre des environs de Paris. Troisième mémoire. Restitution des pieds. Première section. Restitution des différens pieds de derrière". Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (in French). 3: 442–472. Archived from the original on 2023-07-27.
  10. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1804). "Suite de recherches sur les os fossiles de la pierre à plâtre des environs de Paris. Cinquiéme Mémoire. Sur les os du Tronc. Premiére Section. Description d'un squelette presque entier trouvé dans les carriéres de Pantin". Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (in French). 4: 66–81.
  11. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1805). "Troisième mémoire. Deuxième section. Restitution des différens pieds de devant". Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle (in French). 6: 253–283.
  12. ^ a b Cuvier, Geoges (1812). "Résumé général et rétablissement des Squelettes des diverses espèces". Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes: où l'on rétablit les caractères de plusieurs espèces d'animaux que les révolutions du globe paroissent avoir détruites (in French). Vol. 3. Chez Deterville. Archived from the original on 2023-07-31.
  13. ^ Rudwick, Martin J. S. (1997). "Chapter 6: The Animals from the Gypsum Beds around Paris". Georges Cuvier, Fossil Bones, and Geological Catastrophes: New Translations and Interpretations of the Primary Texts. University of Chicago Press.
  14. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1822). Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles, où l'on rétablit les caractères de plusieurs animaux dont les révolutions du globe ont détruit les espèces. Vol. 3. G. Dufour and E. d'Ocagne. Archived from the original on 2023-08-19. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  15. ^ Rudwick, Martin J.S. (1992). "Chapter 2: Keyholes into the Past". Scenes from Deep Time: Early Pictorial Representations of the Prehistoric World. pp. 27–58.
  16. ^ Cuvier, Georges (1824). Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles, où l'on rétablit les caractères de plusieurs animaux dont les révolutions du globe ont détruit les espèces. Vol. 5. G. Dufour and E. d'Ocagne.
  17. ^ Ashworth, James (1 July 2023). "Missing Crystal Palace mammal recreated decades after disappearance". Natural History Museum in London. Archived from the original on 1 July 2023. Retrieved 1 June 2024.
  18. ^ a b Witton, Mark P.; Michel, Ellinor (2022). "Chapter 4: The sculptures: mammals". The Art and Science of the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs. The Crowood Press. pp. 68–91.
  19. ^ a b c d e Abel, Othenio (1924). "Die Rekonstruktion von Palaeotherium magnum Cuvier". Palaeontologische Zeitschrift. 6: 14–24. doi:10.1007/BF03041530.
  20. ^ MacFadden, Bruce J. (1994). "Orthogenesis and scientific thought: old notions die hard". Fossil Horses: Systematics, Paleobiology, and Evolution of the Family Equidae. Cambridge University Press. pp. 27–48.
  21. ^ a b c d e f g Franzen, Jens L. (1968). Revision der Gattung Palaeotherium Cuvier, 1804 (Palaeotheriidae, Perissodactyla, Mammalia). Band 1 (Inaugural Dissertation). University of Freiburg.
  22. ^ a b de Blainville, Henri Marie Ducrotay (1839–1864). Ostéographie, ou, Description iconographique comparée du squelette et du système dentaire des Mammifères récents et fossiles : pour servir de base à la zoologie et à la géologie. Vol. 4. Arthus Bertrand.
  23. ^ Depéret, Charles (1910). "Études sur la famille des Lophiodontidés". Bulletin de la Société géologique de France: 558–577.
  24. ^ Dedieu, Pierre (1977). "Sur la Systématique des Tapiroidea (Mammalia) de l'Éocène européen". Comptes Rendus des séances de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la vie D. 284: 2219–2222.
  25. ^ Ruetimeyer, Ludwig (1862). "Eocaene Säugethiere Gebiet des Schweizerischen Jura". Neue Denkschriften der Allg. Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften. 19: 1–98.
  26. ^ Pomel, Auguste (1853). Catalogue méthodique et descriptif des vertébrés fossiles découverts dans le bassin hydrographique supérieur de la Loire, et surtout dans la vallée de son affluent principal l'Allier Catalogue méthodique et descriptif des vertébrés fossiles découverts dans le bassin hydrographique supérieur de la Loire, et surtout dans la vallée de son affluent principal l'Allier. J. B. Baillière.
  27. ^ Noulet, Jean-Baptiste (1863). "Etude sur les fossiles du terrain éocène supérieur de l'Agout (Tarn)". Mémoires de l'Académie royale des sciences, inscriptions et belles-lettres de Toulouse. 6. 1: 181–206.
  28. ^ Pictet, François Jules; Humbert, Aloïs Humbert (1869). Mémoire sur les animaux vertébrés: trouvés dans le terrain sidérolitique du Canton de Vaud et appartenant a la faune éocène: supplément. Vol. 2. H. Georg.
  29. ^ Fraas, Oscar (1869). Die geognostische sammlung Württembergs im erdgeschoss des Königlichen Naturalien-cabinets zu Stuttgart: Ein führer für die besucher derselben. Self-published.
  30. ^ Gervais, Paul (1875). "Palæothérium du calcaire grossier". Journal de zoologie: 421–422.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Roman, Frédéric (1922). Monographie de la faune de mammifères de Mormoiron (Vaucluse) ludien supérieur. Société géologique de France.
  32. ^ a b Thomas, Gilles; Vanara, Nathalie (2016). "Les carrières sous Paris et sa périphérie, une reconnaissance géopatrimoniale nécessaire". Dynamiques Environnementales - Journal international des géosciences et de l'environnement. 37: 161–165. doi:10.4000/dynenviron.917.
  33. ^ a b Gervais, Paul (1873). "Squelette de grand Paléothérium (Palæotherium magnum de Cuvier): trouvé dans les platrières de Vitry-sur-Seine". Journal de zoologie. 2: 520–523.
  34. ^ a b Gaudry, Jean Albert (1888). Les ancêtres de nos animaux dans les temps géologiques. J. B. Baillière and Fils.
  35. ^ Stehlin, Hans Georg (1904). "Sur les mammifères des Sables bartoniens du Castrais". Bulletin de la Société géologique de France. 4. 4: 445–475.
  36. ^ a b Stehlin, Hans Georg (1904). "Die Säugetiere des schweizerischen Eocaens. Critisher Catalog der Materialen. Zweiter Teil: Palaeotherium. — Plagiolophus. — Propalaeotherium". Abhandlungen der schweizerischen paläontologischen Gesellschaf. 31.
  37. ^ Depéret, Charles (1917). Monographie de la faune de mammifères fossiles du Ludien inférieur d'Euzet-les-Bains (Gard). Lyon A. Rey.
  38. ^ Dietrich, Wilhelm Otto (1922). "Beitrag zur Kenntnis der säugetierführenden Bohnerzformation in Schwaben. 1. Ein vergessenes, neu erschlossenes Höhlenvorkommen terrestrischen Eozäns auf der Ulmer Alb". Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie. 19: 209–224.
  39. ^ Casanovas-Cladellas, María Lourdes. "Datos sobre los Perisodáctilos del yacimiento de Roc de Santa; la nueva especie Palaeotherium crusafonti". Acta Geológica Hispánica. 10 (3): 121–126.
  40. ^ Casanovas-Cladellas, María Lourdes; Santafé Llopis, José Vicente (1980). "El Palaeotherium de talla grande (Palaeotheriidae, Perissodactyla) del yacimiento ludiense de Sossís (Tremp, Lérida)". Butlletí Informatiu, Institut de Paleontologia de Sabadell. 12 (1–2): 21–29.
  41. ^ a b Remy, Jean-Albert (1985). "Nouveaux gisements de mammifères et reptiles dans les Grès de Célas (Eocène sup. du Gard). Etude des Palaeotheriidés (Perissodactyla, Mammalia)". Palaeontographica. Abteilung A, Paläozoologie, Stratigraphie. 189 (4–6): 171–225.
  42. ^ Casanovas-Cladellas, María Lourdes; Santafé Llopis, José-Vicente (1991). "Los Paleotéridos (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) del yacimiento de Llamaquique:(Oviedo, España)". Boletín de Ciencias de la Naturaleza. 41: 101–195.
  43. ^ a b c d e f g h i Remy, Jean-Albert (1992). "Observations sur l'anatomie cranienne du genre Palaeotherium (Perissodactyla, Mammalia): mise en évidence d'un nouveau sous-genre, Franzenitherium". Palaeovertebrata. 21 (3–4): 103–224.
  44. ^ a b Ruiz-Colmenares, Miguel Ángel Cuesta (1993). "Los Palaeotheriidae (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) del Eoceno de la Cuenca del Duero (Castilla y León, España)". Estudios Geológicos. 49 (1–2): 87–109. doi:10.3989/egeol.93491-2341.
  45. ^ Casanovas-Cladellas, María Lourdes; Soler, Lluís Checa; Santafé Llopis, José-Vicente (1998). "Los perisodáctilos del yacimiento ludiense de Sossís (Cuenca Prepirenaica, Lleida, España)". In Martinez, Nieves Lopez; Llovera, Jorge Civis; Casanovas-Cladellas, María Lourdes; Daams, Remmert (eds.). Geología y Paleontología del Eoceno de la Pobla de Segur (Lleida). University of Lleida, Institut d'Estudis Ilerdencs. pp. 235–267.
  46. ^ a b Bai, Bin (2017). "Eocene Pachynolophinae (Perissodactyla, Palaeotheriidae) from China, and their palaeobiogeographical implications". Palaeontology. 60 (6): 837–852. doi:10.1111/pala.12319.
  47. ^ a b c d Métais, Grégoire; Sen, Sevket (2017). "First occurrence of Palaeotheriidae (Perissodactyla) from the late–middle Eocene of eastern Thrace (Greece)". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 16 (4): 382–396. Bibcode:2017CRPal..16..382M. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2017.01.001.
  48. ^ a b Bronnert, Constance; Métais, Grégoire (2023). "Early Eocene hippomorph perissodactyls (Mammalia) from the Paris Basin". Geodiversitas. 45 (9): 277–326. doi:10.5252/geodiversitas2023v45a9.
  49. ^ Bronnert, Constance; Gheerbrant, Emmanuel; Godinot, Marc; Métais, Grégoire (2017). "A primitive perissodactyl (Mammalia) from the early Eocene of Le Quesnoy (MP7, France)". Historical Biology. 30 (1–2): 237–250. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1341502.
  50. ^ a b Badiola, Ainara; Perales-Gogenola, Leire; Astibia, Humberto; Suberbiola, Xabier Pereda (2022). "A synthesis of Eocene equoids (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Iberian Peninsula: new signs of endemism". Historical Biology. 34 (8): 1623–1631. Bibcode:2022HBio...34.1623B. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2060098. S2CID 248164842.
  51. ^ a b Remy, Jean A.; Krasovec, Gabriel; Lopez, Éric; Marandat, Bernard; Lihoreau, Fabrice (2019). "The Palaeotheriidae (Equoidea, Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from the Eocene fauna of Aumelas (Hérault department, France)". Geodiversitas. 41 (1): 525–585. doi:10.5252/geodiversitas2019v41a13.
  52. ^ a b Remy, Jean A. (2017). "Critical comments on the genus Propachynolophus Lemoine, 1891 (Mammalia, Perissodactyla, Equoidea)". Palaeovertebrata. 41: 1–18. doi:10.18563/pv.41.1.e3.
  53. ^ Antunes, Miguel Telles (1992). "Contributions to the Eocene palaeontology and stratigraphy of B eira Alta, Portugal. II - New Late Eocene mammalian remnants from Coja (Portugal) and the presence of Palaeotherium magnum Cuvier". Ciências da Terra/Earth Sciences Journal. 11: 83–89.
  54. ^ Remy, Jean-Albert (2015). "Les Périssodactyles (Mammalia) du gisement Bartonien supérieur de Robiac (Éocène moyen du Gard, Sud de la France)". Palaeovertebrata. 39 (1): 1–98. doi:10.18563/pv.39.1.e3.
  55. ^ Aguilar, Jean-Pierre; Legendre, Serge; Michaux, Jacques (1997). "Synthèses et tableaux de corrélations". Actes du Congrès Bio-chroM'97. Mémoires et Travaux de l'EPHE Institut de Montpellier 21 (in French). École Pratique des Hautes Études-Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, Montpellier. pp. 769–850.
  56. ^ Gagnaison, Cyril; Leroux, Jean-Jacques (2013). "Un crâne de Diplobune secundaria Cuvier, 1822 de Saint-Capraise-d'Eymet (Dordogne)". Symbioses. 29: 43–46.
  57. ^ a b c d von Zittel, Karl Alfred (1925). Schlosser, Max (ed.). Text-Book of Paleontology. Volume III. Mammalia. Macmillan and Co. Limited. pp. 179–180.
  58. ^ Lihoreau, Fabrice; Boisserie, Jean-Renaud; Viriot, Laurent; Brunet, Michel (2006). "Anthracothere dental anatomy reveals a late Miocene Chado-Libyan bioprovince". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (23): 8763–8767. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.8763L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0603126103. PMC 1482652. PMID 16723392.
  59. ^ a b Perales-Gogenola, Leire; Badiola, Ainara; Pereda-Suberbiola, Xabier; Astibia, Humberto (2022). "New Eocene fossil remains of Palaeotheriidae (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) from Mazaterón (Soria, Castile and Leon, Spain)". Historical Biology. 34 (8). doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.2025363.
  60. ^ a b c d Franzen, Jens Lorenz (1982). "Das Gebiss der Gattung Palaeotherium Cuvier 1804 Morphologie und Konstruktion". In Mazin, J.M.; Salmon, E. (eds.). Actes du Symposium paléontologique Georges Cuvier, Montbéliard - France, 1982: communications données à l'occasion du cent cinquantième anniversaire de la mort de Georges Cuvier, du 25 octobre au 28 octobre 1982, au Musée du Château. Le Musée du Château. pp. 197–207.
  61. ^ Franzen, Jens Lorenz (1972). "Die taxonomische, phylogenetische, konstruktive und funktionelle Bedeutung der relativen Länge des postcaninen Diastems bei den Equoidea". Senckenbergiana Lethaea. 53 (5): 333–352.
  62. ^ Santi, Guiseppe (2000). "Palaeotheriidae (Perissodactyla, Mammalia) Del Paleogene Dell'Europa Centrale: Note E Considerazioni Preliminari". Natura Bresciana. 32: 15–22.
  63. ^ Rose, Kenneth D.; Holbrook, Luke T.; Luckett, Patrick (2018). "Deciduous premolars of Eocene Equidae and their phylogenetic significance". Historical Biology. 30 (1–2): 89–118. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1291637.
  64. ^ a b c d MacLaren, Jamie A.; Nauwelaerts, Sandra (2020). "Modern tapirs as morphofunctional analogues for locomotion in endemic Eocene European perissodactyls". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 27: 245–263. doi:10.1007/s10914-019-09460-1.
  65. ^ Stehlin, Hans Georg (1938). "Zur Charakteristik einiger Palaeotheriumarten des oberen Ludien". Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae. 31 (2): 263–292.
  66. ^ Casanovas-Cladellas, María Lourdes; Soler, Luis Checa; Santafé Llopis, José-Vicente (1992). "Éléments du squelette postcrâniendu genre Palaeotherium (Perissodactyla) du Ludien de Roc de Santa (Province de Lerida, Espagne)". Geobios. 25 (4): 535–552.
  67. ^ Remy, Jean-Albert (2004). "Le genre Plagiolophus (Palaeotheriidae, Perissodactyla, Mammalia): révision systématique, morphologie et histologie dentaires, anatomie crânienne, essai d'interprétation fonctionnelle". Palaeovertebrata. 33 (1–4).
  68. ^ a b Ellenberger, Paul (1980). "Sur les empreintes de pas des gros mammifères de l'Eocène supérieur de Garrigues-ste-Eulalie (Gard)". Palaeovertebrata. 9: 37–78.
  69. ^ Abbassi, Nasrollah; Lucas, Spencer G.; Gholam, Reza Zaare (2015). "First report of Oligocene vertebrate footprints from Iran". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 440: 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.08.039.
  70. ^ Belvedere, Matteo; Fabre, Emmanuel; Pandolfi, Luca; Legal, Stephane; Coster, Pauline (2023). "Stepping into Oligocene. A reassessment of the early Oligocene mammal tracks from Saignon (SE France)". Historical Biology: 1–17. doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2286275.
  71. ^ a b Ataabadi, Majid Mirzaie; Khazaee, Ahmad Reza (2004). "New Eocene Mammal and Bird Footprints from Birjand Area, Eastern Iran". Ichnos. 11 (3–4): 363–370. doi:10.1080/10420940490428724.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:PrimalMustelid/sandbox&oldid=1234377421"