User talk:138.163.106.72
New messages will appear at the bottom of this page. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
|
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
Older warnings and blocks |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.163.106.72) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place June 2008[edit]
July 2008[edit]
Your edits to December 31[edit]Dear 138.163.106.72,
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC) July 2008[edit]
August 2008[edit]
Anon editing temporarily blocked due to continued vandalism[edit]August 2008[edit]September 2008[edit]
Vandalism warning[edit]
October 2008[edit]Please do not remove correct, factual information from articles as you did at Amen. If you do so again you may be blocked from editing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC) November 2008[edit]
138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I always strive to add useful content to wikipedia. I know that others sometimes do not, But I thing that is deplorable. I do not recall what it is that I put as an edit to the Creation Science page, but I can assure you, anything I added was designed to be as objective and helpful as possible. Creation Science is a hot-button issue for many, and I presume I saw an inappropriately perjorative assertion in the topic, and tried to make it more objective. If I did that, I would expect that the individual who added the biased assertion took umbrage, and complained. But I feel I have been wronged. Please contact me at <email redacted for your privacy>. If you will unblock me, I will register to make contentions like this in the future easier to resolve. I am sure wikipedia would like to serve ALL individuals who come here for information, which will require that some controversial text will need to be contained in some topics. That is not an indication of a problem, but the interplay of differeing viewpoints in the marketplace of ideas. (In my opinion...) Decline reason: Deleting whole sections of pertinent, sourced content is vandalism, which you also edit-warred about. I am not persuaded that you mean to contribute constructively. Please see also WP:NPOV. — Sandstein 22:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. 138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I am astonished at your statement, "Deleting whole sections of pertinent, sourced content is vandalism." If I did such a thing it was a complete accident -- I would never do that intentionally; I am not a censor. I recognize full well that "what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." If I can delete what others say, others could equally easily delete what I say. Your statement, "which you also warred about," is equally astonishing to me--I mean, when I read the things that you wrote I could only marvel, and say "What?!? When? How?!?" I presume that "warring" refers to back and forth editing and reediting by two or more individuals, and I don't recall ever having done that, either. Now, I know you’re busy (we all are--welcome to the 21st century...), but gee!, I really would like to see what it is that you saw that has brought us to this point either here or at <email redacted for your privacy>. Perhaps I did do what you are saying, and have forgotten about it; if this is the case, seeing the details would remind me. I am eager not to be thought a vandal (or to be a vandal in reality!). Additionally, I generally am the sort of person who would try to get rules I disagreed with changed, rather than just ignoring them. But I read in the the pages this incident has brought me to see, that I otherwise would not have read, that it is possible for others to be associated with the same IP address. If this is something done by others, that I had no hand in, I want to clear my reputation. So seeing what you are referring to might serve that purpose as well. Decline reason: You may not be aware of it, but all edits you, or others, make under this IP address are logged at this page. You can see what exactly happened at each of these edits by clicking on the "(diff)" link next to each log entry. These contributions clearly show you, or someone else on this IP address, repeatedly removed large sections of referenced content without explanation, and/or added disruptive notes to the article. If you genuinely did not make these edits, you are welcome to request an account. However, you have not provided sufficient reason to unblock this IP address. While I'm here, please do not post your email address. We will not send responses to your email address unless you contact us at unblock-en-l If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
January 2009[edit]
February 2009[edit]April 2009[edit]
May 2009[edit]
June 2009[edit]
September 2009[edit]
138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: kindly stop blocking the entire NMCI from making useful edits because of some morons Decline reason: Sorry. With a block log like that, your best bet is to create an account at home and use it instead. TNXMan 14:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. April 2010[edit]
August 2010[edit]
138.163.106.72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Please stop blocking the entire NMCI network just because of some morons who can't control themselves. Decline reason: Problem is, we can't tell who is using the ip from one moment to the next, and we can't just block the disruptive users of a shared ip, there is just no way to do it. You can avoid this problem by creating an account from another ip and logging in with it here. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. September 2011[edit]
|
January 2015
[edit] This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Bouyon music, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Caribbean music vandal. Binksternet (talk) 07:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
February 2015
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deflategate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 15:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Estanislao López— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm Dustin V. S.. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Boston because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dustin (talk) 18:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Commandant of the United States Army Command and General Staff College. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. Reify-tech (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
May 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brussels sprout has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
June 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Deadly force seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Badass with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kevin Kelly (politician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 20:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 20:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Kumeyaay seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm JimVC3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United States Seventh Fleet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JimVC3 (talk) 18:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
September 2020
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New York Jets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |