Jump to content

User talk:FernCreekWiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2023

[edit]

Officially gone. Bye.

September 2021

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ned Beatty, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see WP:NOTBROKEN - FlightTime (open channel) 16:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FernCreekWiki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi FernCreekWiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful with Refill

[edit]

Hello @FernCreekWiki. I am @Archer1234. I noticed that you have been helping to fill out bare URLs in many articles. That is much appreciated. However, please be aware that while Refill 2 is a powerful tool, it is also buggy. Sometimes the "filling" it does is poor; sometimes so poor that it actually makes the reference worse. For example, this edit to Roman Catholic Diocese of Bardstown results in a much poorer reference than what was already in the article. I took the liberty of reformatting the reference (and another one) using the appropriate 'cite' template (in this case {{cite encyclopedia}}), which captures the fullness of the references. You should go back through your previous edits and make sure that the resulting updates are good. You can read more about the limitations of Refill and other reference filling tools here: User:BrownHairedGirl/No-reflinks_websites#Reference-filling_tools. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. I am not the expert at these tools but have learned a lot about using them through first-hand experience. Thank you. — Archer1234 (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FernCreekWiki, this is a reminder that you have to be careful when using Refill. This edit you made to Joker Marchant Stadium replaced a dead link with a link to a completely unrelated article. I don't know why theledger.com redirected the dead link to an unrelated article, but they are not alone in doing that. Many websites do that (although they usually just redirect to the sites main web page), so you MUST review every change that Refill suggests to see if there is an errant redirect happening. I have fixed the edit I identified above at Joker Marchant Stadium (along with some other miscellaneous edits as detailed in the edit summary), but, again, I remind you that you must be on the lookout for similar situations. If you have any questions, let me know or ask at The Teahouse. — Archer1234 (t·c) 21:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@FernCreekWiki, here is another example of an incorrect change suggested by Refill that you did not correct: — Archer1234 (t·c) 21:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]