User talk:Fugabus

Welcome!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies. — **Welcome!**

Hello, Fugabus, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Otuọcha (talk) 12:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biafra Liberation Army

You are legally obligated to disclose your conflict of interest. If you have a relationship to Biafra Liberation Army you must tell us. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having read through the content of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, I hereby confirm that I am not a COI editor. I'm an independent, volunteer contributor here on Wikipedia. I wasn't paid by anyone nor motivated by any organization to to edit on behalf of them on Wikipedia. Biafra Liberation Army is a general topic and I am not affiliated to them in any way or nature.__Fugabus (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Fugabus. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by - Master of Hedgehogs ^(converse) ^{(hate that hedgehog!)} 19:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Johnjupither per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnjupither. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fugabus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just received a notification that I have been indefinitely blocked from editing. I deny having any link with the suspected sock and am appealing for a review of my block. I am Fugabus, and I have no other account on Wikipedia. Please kindly verify and review my block. I appreciate the fact this case of sockpuppetry is still "suspected" and not "comfirmed". Thank you for reviewing per my honest appeal. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 15:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You need to address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnjupither. Yamla (talk) 19:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Greetings. While you reformulate your request, I'd like to provide a little insight and ask a follow-up question. First insight: Check User confirmed that your relationship with the prior socks did not relate to your IP, meaning we know you didn't switch accounts on the same device without changing your network connection/settings. But not much else. Second insight: you were blocked on behavioral grounds, so see also WP:MEAT though no admin has actually said so. Lastly a question to follow all this up: are you, do you know, do you have any relation with, and have you been collaborating or contributing with or through User:War_Term? Your responses might help you address the present block, or save us all time at another SPI. Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 00:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JFHJR, I am just a volunteer on Wikipedia and I do what I do out of passion for writing and improvement of the English Wikipedia. I have no affiliation with anyone here including the War_Term. I am a lone editor. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 18:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Yamla:,

I have tried to comment on the w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnjupither but it does not allow me. It says "This account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia" I'm perplexed right now. Please, help and maneuver. I really wish to defend myself properly there. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 18:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FugabusYou were advised to address the concerns mentioned there. Obviously you can’t edit there, you need to post here. Doug Weller talk 18:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Doug Weller: I am the subject matter here. I have been finding it difficult to understand how I relate to the user 'Johnjupither.' I am not related to the account per se. I am a different editor who works to improve Wikipedia's scope and coverage on topics I feel are not yet generally covered properly. Although I have been blocked, I feel bad, and I believe things will get better after an investigation. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to address the concerns mentioned at the SPI in a new unblock request. Doug Weller talk 19:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the subject matter here — are you the subject of an article on Wikipedia? JFHJr (㊟) 03:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope! I mean that I am the person blocked and not a subject of an article on Wikipedia. Please, don't misconstrue my use of wordings. «fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 18:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-appeal for an Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Fugabus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

«fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC) Hello @Bbb23, @The Wordsmith, @Vanamonde93, @Gråbergs Gråa Sång, @JFHJr, @Doug Weller[reply]

I am blocked on grounds on sockpuppetry, and I wish to clear my name and appeal again for an unblock per guidance of @Doug Weller:. I am an editor with an interest in politics and war, and since I joined Wikipedia, I have primarily edited within those scopes. I have found myself most interested in Biafra-related pages. I saw many opportunities for editing them because they were not properly covered on Wikipedia. Simon Ekpa seems to be the leading figure in this area, and I have tried my best to expand the article.

It's worrisome that the area I have edited most has been vandalized or edited by sockpuppets in the past. To be frank, I have no association with any other editor on Wikipedia. I am Fugabus, and I have only one account. I appreciate that CU confirmed this after Bbb23's investigation.

Biafra is an expanding area, and sources to improve the drafts I have created are in the public domain. I stopped editing because I was not healthy enough and took a break, but upon seeing the notification that I was blocked, I became worried. At first, I thought it was because of my inactivity, but I later found out it was because I was suspected of being a sockpuppet. I strongly deny this and therefore, appeal to be unblocked.

Cheers.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=[[User:Fugabus|«fjuːgəbʌs»]] ([[User talk:Fugabus#top|talk]]) 18:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC) Hello @[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]], @[[User:The Wordsmith|The Wordsmith]], @[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]], @[[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|Gråbergs Gråa Sång]], @[[User:JFHJr|JFHJr]],  @[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] 

I am blocked on grounds on sockpuppetry, and I wish to clear my name and appeal again for an unblock per guidance of <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]]:</span>. I am an editor with an interest in politics and war, and since I joined Wikipedia, I have primarily edited within those scopes. I have found myself most interested in [[Biafra]]-related pages. I saw many opportunities for editing them because they were not properly covered on Wikipedia. [[Simon Ekpa]] seems to be the leading figure in this area, and I have tried my best to expand the article.

It's worrisome that the area I have edited most has been vandalized or edited by sockpuppets in the past. To be frank, I have no association with any other editor on Wikipedia. I am Fugabus, and I have only one account. I appreciate that CU confirmed this after Bbb23's investigation.

Biafra is an expanding area, and sources to improve the drafts I have created are in the public domain. I stopped editing because I was not healthy enough and took a break, but upon seeing the notification that I was blocked, I became worried. At first, I thought it was because of my inactivity, but I later found out it was because I was suspected of being a sockpuppet. I strongly deny this and therefore, appeal to be unblocked.

Cheers. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Fugabus|«fjuːgəbʌs»]] ([[User talk:Fugabus#top|talk]]) 18:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC) Hello @[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]], @[[User:The Wordsmith|The Wordsmith]], @[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]], @[[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|Gråbergs Gråa Sång]], @[[User:JFHJr|JFHJr]],  @[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] 

I am blocked on grounds on sockpuppetry, and I wish to clear my name and appeal again for an unblock per guidance of <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]]:</span>. I am an editor with an interest in politics and war, and since I joined Wikipedia, I have primarily edited within those scopes. I have found myself most interested in [[Biafra]]-related pages. I saw many opportunities for editing them because they were not properly covered on Wikipedia. [[Simon Ekpa]] seems to be the leading figure in this area, and I have tried my best to expand the article.

It's worrisome that the area I have edited most has been vandalized or edited by sockpuppets in the past. To be frank, I have no association with any other editor on Wikipedia. I am Fugabus, and I have only one account. I appreciate that CU confirmed this after Bbb23's investigation.

Biafra is an expanding area, and sources to improve the drafts I have created are in the public domain. I stopped editing because I was not healthy enough and took a break, but upon seeing the notification that I was blocked, I became worried. At first, I thought it was because of my inactivity, but I later found out it was because I was suspected of being a sockpuppet. I strongly deny this and therefore, appeal to be unblocked.

Cheers. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=[[User:Fugabus|«fjuːgəbʌs»]] ([[User talk:Fugabus#top|talk]]) 18:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC) Hello @[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]], @[[User:The Wordsmith|The Wordsmith]], @[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]], @[[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|Gråbergs Gråa Sång]], @[[User:JFHJr|JFHJr]],  @[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] 

I am blocked on grounds on sockpuppetry, and I wish to clear my name and appeal again for an unblock per guidance of <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]]:</span>. I am an editor with an interest in politics and war, and since I joined Wikipedia, I have primarily edited within those scopes. I have found myself most interested in [[Biafra]]-related pages. I saw many opportunities for editing them because they were not properly covered on Wikipedia. [[Simon Ekpa]] seems to be the leading figure in this area, and I have tried my best to expand the article.

It's worrisome that the area I have edited most has been vandalized or edited by sockpuppets in the past. To be frank, I have no association with any other editor on Wikipedia. I am Fugabus, and I have only one account. I appreciate that CU confirmed this after Bbb23's investigation.

Biafra is an expanding area, and sources to improve the drafts I have created are in the public domain. I stopped editing because I was not healthy enough and took a break, but upon seeing the notification that I was blocked, I became worried. At first, I thought it was because of my inactivity, but I later found out it was because I was suspected of being a sockpuppet. I strongly deny this and therefore, appeal to be unblocked.

Cheers. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

«fjuːgəbʌs» (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have only one account. I appreciate that CU confirmed this after Bbb23's investigation. RoySmith found you to be unrelated to UniBrill. Vanamonde93 found your connection to Johnjupither to be inconclusive. Your statement that a CU confirmed that you have only one account is incorrect.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the blocking administrator, I believed the behavioral evidence was enough to show a connection. Aside from the overlapping SPA interest, there's the time this account reactivated days after a confirmed sock was blocked. I also saw strong similarities in language and edit summaries. However, if any administrator does their own investigation and comes to a different conclusion, I have no objection to them handling the unblock request as they see fit. No need to consult me first. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 17:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]