User talk:ATMC13

ATMC13, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ATMC13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to James Arthur, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Queen Jessie J song

Hello ATMC13,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Queen Jessie J song for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Music Notability

Hi ATMC13. I've noticed that you've been attempting to make Queen (Jessie J song) into an article through new page patrol as has at least one other user, Onel5969. It seems like you might not be aware of wikipedia's guidelines around notability for music. These are the guidelines that help us decide if a song should have its own page or should be redirected to the artist or album. Right now there doesn't seem to be indication that this particular song meets those guidelines on the article page. So if you desire to recreate the page, please indicate how the song meets the notability guidelines with a sourced citation. This will prevent you from getting into an edit war, which is frustrating all around. Let me know if you have questions. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop changing "featuring Miguel" to "with Miguel" for the song "Remind Me to Forget". Do not change it again without a reliable source and do not add unsourced songs to discographies. Hayman30 (talk) 14:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On iTunes it says Kygo and Miguel not Kygo featuring Miguel so it should be "with Miguel" not "featuring Miguel". ATMC13 21:44, 15 June 2018 (BGT)

It literally says "ft. Miguel" on the cover. Sources on article also refer to Miguel as a featured artist. iTunes saying otherwise doesn't override what other sources say. Hayman30 (talk) 07:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Thrill of It All (Sam Smith album). Hayman30 (talk) 08:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Tomlinson. General Ization ^Talk 17:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Brighter Days. Magnolia677 (talk) 08:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nina Nesbitt. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was making that page what it should be like so I don’t understand why I have been temporarily blocked. ATMC13 (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2018 (BST)

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kodaline discography. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ATMC13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Kodaline makes a guest appearance on Sigala’s album so I put a guest appearance template on Kodaline’s discography page

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. -- ATMC13 (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2018 (BST)

{{unblock|reason=It wasn’t my intention to damage the page because most artists have guests appearance section on their discography page and I was doing that for Kodaline.}}. -- ATMC13 (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2018 (BST)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ATMC13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ATMC13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Waves (Normani song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lapadite (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But the next song of his is only want you. ATMC13 (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2019 (BGT)

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at One Touch (Jess Glynne and Jax Jones song), you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 18:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ellie Goulding discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 12:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jade Ramsey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Ramsey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Ramsey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Teratix ₵ 13:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. PerinPeron21 (talk) 20:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rudimental discography. Next time you add unsourced material to an article, you are being reported. Enough is enough, and you have received enough warnings to stop this. Ss112 13:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grace Davies singer

A tag has been placed on Grace Davies singer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

u1

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Laun chba ller 10:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonas Blue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fuck, I'm Lonely. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 20:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anne-Marie discography. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 20:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lauv. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 20:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of Emmerdale characters (2017) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Could you also please stop adding every relative possible to the infoboxes of soap opera characters. Per WP:SOAPS: "relatives listed should be limited to closer family and generations having some relevance to the character in question." Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 02:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on LM5: The Tour. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. livelikemusic talk! 14:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was there at their concert and More Than Words and Touch are set out as the encore bit of the set list . ATMC13 (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2019 (BGT)

You are not a reliable source; the sources state otherwise, and therefore, we WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE. livelikemusic talk! 18:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. livelikemusic talk! 02:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at We Got Love (Sigala and Ella Henderson song). Jalen Folf (talk) 23:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Romance (Camila Cabello album), you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic talk! 16:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cry for me and Easy are classed as singles so they should be where the singles should be on the album’s wiki page. ATMC13 (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2019 (BGT)

You now have 3 months to read WP:V

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Glorious (EP)

The article Glorious (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only two reviews out of WP:THREE found in a quick Google search. WP:TOOSOON to determine whether this extended play passes WP:NALBUM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]