User talk:Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins

Welcome!

Hello, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies shared use. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 17:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My username relates to my interests:

"Big Blue" - Aircraft, the RAF

Crayfish - small freshwater lobsters, of which the Blue ones are most prized

Kray Twins - British gangsters. And I was born a twin, in the UK

There is also a pun in there relating to computing -IBM (known as Big Blue) and Cray

But if I have to change it, so be it

Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 12:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bird taxonomy

Hi, I've noticed that you have been changing the genus of birds in Wikipedia articles such as the blue crane, the demoiselle crane and the bluethroat.

English Wikipedia uses the taxonomy and the common names of the IOC World Bird List as explained here.

There are other world checklists including BLI/IUCN, Clements, and Howard & Moore 4. A project has been established to create a single taxonomy for world birds by the "Working Group Avian Checklists" – you can read about it here. It uses the IOC list as a starting point. - Aa77zz (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not realise. I did check the Talk pages, but did not see anything regarding wp:consensus. I did notice that Anthropoides had been wp:BLAR with the note Change to a redirect to Grus - wikipedia follows IOC classification but no explanation of why, who decided this, etc. So I thought ^{[citation needed]} and wp:BeBold Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has used the taxonomy of the IOC for a long time. In 2017 this was confirmed by a vote of the bird editors who were active at that time - see the archive here. By following a single authority we can keep article consistent - species, genera, families etc. The BirdLife International (BLI) taxonomy used by the IUCN (see here) lags the IOC and Clements - probably because BLI lack the resources to keep up to date with all the changes. For example the classification of the hummingbirds was reorganised based on a big study published 2014 (see the tribe Trochilini - 11 genera resurrected etc) - but BLI haven't yet implemented these changes. - Aa77zz (talk) 12:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonbar placement

Taxonbars should not be placed above an External links section, as you had done at mayhaw, nor above a navbox as you had at Pildra. Taxonbars go at the end of the page. The only things that should come after them are {{Authority control}} (if present), categories and stub-sorting templates (if present). Plantdrew (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Plantdrew Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 17:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You spoke my mind. I was thinking of requesting that you create an article on Petitella, but you have already done it. Thanks for your work on the Petitella article. Maliner (talk) 15:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many, many Thanks for the Barnstar!! You made my Christmas

I think I have finished editing for now. It's sure a good start

Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nuptial tubercles has been accepted

Nuptial tubercles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBritinator (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins. Thank you for your work on Psalidodon fasciatus. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins Nice work!. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcotos:Thank you very much!! It's always nice to get praised for helping to fix Wikipedia! Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guigarra has been accepted

Guigarra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Please note that user sandbox pages, such as your User:Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins/sandbox, are not allowed to be filed in mainspace categories as if they were already finished articles. The page must stay out of categories while it's in sandbox, and categories are to be added only if and when the content is actually being moved into a real article. Since I've already had to remove the page from categories three times in the space of just one month, please also note that it is a thing you can be sanctioned for being disruptive if it continues, so please do not readd your sandbox page to categories again. Bearcat (talk) 13:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And Thanks for deleting stuff from MY Sandbox. I'm sorry you had to do it three times, yet only warned me now. This crackdown probably explains why I have seen articles produced from Drafts with lots of <-- remarks all over them.

As you seem to be a Very Important Wikipedian, perhaps you can convince the higher-ups to simply filter Users Sandboxes out of Categories instead? So that we juniors can actually experiment with a FULL page preview in our private, testing areas ?? I'm sure that is not beyond the realms of standard coding? Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: No. 2 School of Technical Training RAF (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:No. 2 School of Technical Training RAF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nuptial tubercles

The article Nuptial tubercles you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nuptial tubercles and Talk:Nuptial tubercles/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ForksForks -- ForksForks (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]