User talk:Gtin386

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Danielgoulartvieira per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danielgoulartvieira. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the blocking will no longer be necessary I also understand why it is blocked, I know I won't do it again and I will make productive contributions or wait for someone related to article administration to do so.

I also know that the blocking was not necessary to avoid damage or interruptions (i.e., that the blocking does not violate the blocking policy as the page was only completed as it was being updated) and

that my conduct (on any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the blocking, and that the aforementioned person has already taken a friendly stance towards Wikipedia, reiterating the possibility that he will not make any report by any other means and has acknowledged and withdrawn of their disagreement.

I see that you certainly don't speak the language, what is your native language? I am a trained English teacher. Gtin386 (talk) 19:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gtin386 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think the blocking will no longer be necessary I also understand why it is blocked, I know I won't do it again and I will make productive contributions or wait for someone related to article administration to do so. I also know that the blocking was not necessary to avoid damage or interruptions (i.e., that the blocking does not violate the blocking policy as the page was only completed as it was being updated) and that my conduct (on any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the blocking, and that the aforementioned person has already taken a friendly stance towards Wikipedia, reiterating the possibility that he will not make any report by any other means and has acknowledged and withdrawn of their disagreement. Gtin386 (talk) 19:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gtin386 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If there are several reports, because I said the course was postgraduate, I graduated in computer science. So in my case my account is like a single account on the login page, I think I'm checking the permanence of Wikipedia from Mediawiki and above. And about you, jpgordon Josh Gordon, I hope you are rehabilitated from your misconduct in confronting your employers and an important warning that your page violates Wikipedia rules as it is partially about you. Gtin386 (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.