Hello, I'm Jay8g. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ferdinand von Prondzynski without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 18:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ferdinand von Prondzynski, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please provide an edit summary and discuss your reasons for removing the content on the article's talk page in the future.Abasteraster (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further to the above, please do not return to the same edit / deletion without a Talk page debate - this relates to past extensive debates. The matters mentioned in these few lines were very material and public, going to the Supreme Court, costing a lot, and relating to one of the subject's areas of expertise, so some mention seems necessary. SeoR (talk) 22:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
