User talk:IntGrah

Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue

I don't understand why you moved Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue. There is only one. Do you suggest to move the Brandenburg Concertos? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I made a mistake, but my thought process was that if a title is not directly associated with Bach, then it should have some indication of the composer, (parentheses or BWV). For example, Goldberg Variations, Well-Tempered Clavier and St Matthew Passion are almost synonymous with "Bach" by their titles, but Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue, Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, and Overture in the French style are not so much, either because the title is generic or in German. I think Brandenburg Concertos would fall into the former. What do you think of this rule of thumb? Sorry for not discussing this change first. IntGrah (talk) 07:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you moved more than that one. Please consider reverting yourself. You can propose a renaming on WT:Classical music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of masters of Trinity College, Cambridge

Congratulations, IntGrah! The list you nominated, List of masters of Trinity College, Cambridge, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unbiased sources

Hello, again the user unspoken passion used the word "imposed" therefore there was a source needed for such writing, in this case, the page is about a concept of law of a religion, and the sources of it are Quran and hadith otherwise he (unspoken passion) did not provide litte to no evidences for his writings, and when he did the netruality his sources were questionable and biased, im not accusing anyone but i think because of his profile info that he is intersted in topics of counterterrorism or war on terror and the misreperstaion (in my view) of a huge amount of people for faults of a small few has made him biased without knowledge, therefore i am gonna revision that page and i use netrual,unbiased sources for the writing, please feel free to tell me if you think im incorrect in anyway so i can improve my writing, thank you and gn. 88.240.93.246 (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]