User talk:Natcase
License tagging for Image:NewOrleansBachmann1851.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:NewOrleansBachmann1851.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
No More Fish, No Fisherman
[edit]Thanks for the No Coal, No Dole referrence. Do you have the name of the Victorian Christmas carol as well? Looking at your page, I would guess that you are well aware off Stan Roger's song ""The Idiot""? Pustelnik (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Thanks again.Pustelnik (talk) 03:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Parícutin
[edit]Thanks for checking up so carefully on the accents. Sorry for causing grief by changing it the other way. AltaVista gave me 9K hits for Parícutin and 10K for Paricutín, so usage is not as settled as I had thought. Anyway, keep up the good work. --Lavintzin 16:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Minneapolis
[edit]The Original Barnstar | ||
To Natcase, on the occasion of Minneapolis, Minnesota reaching featured article. With thanks -Susanlesch 06:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC) |
This user is a participant in WikiProject Religious Society of Friends. |
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Garrison Keillor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 18:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Edison High School
[edit]Sorry about that, must have just been a mistake. I may have confused articles. — Calebrw (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
another dyk
[edit]-- well done. thx for Whitney Darrow, Jr. from the wiki. Victuallers (talk) 09:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
The article Gospel Gossip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Single rated as #6 pick by Pitchfork is not enough to pass WP:BAND requirements
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M0RD00R (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gospel Gossip
[edit]A tag has been placed on Gospel Gossip requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. M0RD00R (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- As you requested on my talk page, with respect to the above-noted article's contents, I've retrieved them and placed them into a "sandbox" page for you found at User:Natcase/Sandbox. Please feel free to leave me a further note if this is not what you wanted, or if there's something further you require. Best of luck with bringing this in line with the notability requirements for bands. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Natcase! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 745 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Ahmad Maceo Eldridge Cleaver - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Mike Waterson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Ahmad Maceo Eldridge Cleaver has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:BIO
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 02:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit]ICHTHUS |
January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Apocalypse Now
[edit]Please refrain from replacing all instances of Chief with Chef. There are two characters in the movie, Chief and Chef.
- Frederic Forrest -- Jay 'Chef' Hicks
- Albert Hall -- Chief Phillips
Edit in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apocalypse_Now&diff=prev&oldid=564567456 DouglasCalvert (talk) 14:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
January 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carleton College may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Notable faculty have included [[Ian Barbour]], winner of the 1999 [[Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion], [[Laurence McKinley Gould]], Antarctic explorer, and [[
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit] Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shell Oil Company. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Boundary Waters Canoe Wilderness Area.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boundary Waters Canoe Wilderness Area.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Topography techniques and subfields has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:Topography techniques and subfields, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 04:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Natcase. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Natcase. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Natcase. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)