Jump to content

User talk:Nenpog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indefinite topic ban from medical imaging and ionizing radiation

[edit]

Per consensus in this thread at WP:AN/I, you are indefinitely topic-banned from posting any material related to medical imaging or ionizing radiation, broadly construed, anywhere on Wikipedia. The topic ban applies to all pages and all namespaces (talk pages, user talk pages, project pages, etc), with the exception that you may appeal or question this topic ban itself in the appropriate venues. The formal closure of the AN/I thread is here.

Violations of the topic ban may result in a warning or a block from editing, at the discretion of uninvolved administrators. You may appeal this topic ban at the administrator's noticeboard, or by contacting the Arbitration Committee. MastCell Talk 17:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In light of continuing issues, I'm going to expand the scope of the topic ban to include project policies and guidelines. It's obvious that you've exported your problematic editing to some of this site's core policy pages, which isn't appropriate.

Please recognize that this is an alternative to an indefinite block and siteban, which I think evidence would amply justify. If you have any interest in editing other topics, under the policies and guidelines that currently exist, you are free to do so. If you edit any project policies or guidelines, or associated talk pages, you will be blocked. MastCell Talk 19:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of Topic Ban

[edit]

17:49, 10 July 2012: Topic Ban:[1] (Note that the ban was very specific in saying that the only exception to the "...anywhere on Wikipedia. The topic ban applies to all pages and all namespaces (talk pages, user talk pages, project pages, etc)" clause was that Nenpog may appeal the topic ban itself at WP:AN or by contacting WP:ARBCOM).

18:25, 10 July 2012: First violation of Topic Ban: [2]

Elapsed time before violating the topic ban: 36 minutes. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to let that one instance go, because perhaps I haven't been clear enough. This needs to stop now. You (Nenpog) need to drop this dispute in all of its forms, and at all of the forums in which you've shopped it. That means no more arguing about WP:NOR, or on Jimbo's talk page, or anywhere on Wikipedia, about anything related to this dispute. If you want to continue editing here, you need to find another topic and edit it within this site's existing policies and guidelines. If you can't do that, or don't want to, then your account will be blocked indefinitely. MastCell Talk 19:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't yet lost patience. Nenpog, let me make this clear. "In light of continuing issues, I'm going to expand the scope of the topic ban to include project policies and guidelines. It's obvious that you've exported your problematic editing to some of this site's core policy pages, which isn't appropriate. " That means, no matter how well meaning, you are currently not allowed to discuss or propose changes to wikipedia policies or guidelines. This includes NOR. Thus, your *only* option at this point is to stay away from most of the pages in the Wikipedia: namespace, and only focus on editing articles themselves. If you edit carefully, and demonstrate a change of behavior, it is possible that the bans enacted will be lifted in the future. --KarlB (talk) 00:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Let me make this even clearer. Don't talk about it, anywhere. Don't talk about NOR, or any other policy or guideline. Don't edit any policy or guideline. Don't talk about or edit ionizing radiation, medical imaging, or anything else that anyone might possibly consider related to those two. Period. We, the community, no longer trust you to edit or discuss in those areas in a way that is beneficial to Wikipedia. So do something else. Try other things on Wikipedia that are less problematic. Do so long enough, and productively enough, and you might regain the community's trust. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 20:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nenpog, this nonsense has got to stop. It is not MastCell who has imposed the topic ban on you, it is the Wikipedia community. Per consensus in this thread at WP:AN/I, you are indefinitely topic-banned from posting any material related to medical imaging or ionizing radiation, broadly construed, anywhere on Wikipedia. The topic ban applies to all pages and all namespaces (talk pages, user talk pages, project pages, etc), with the exception that you may appeal or question this topic ban itself in the appropriate venues. The formal closure of the AN/I thread is here. It also includes attempting to get policies and guidelines changed to support the edits you are topic banned from making. Violations of the topic ban may result in a warning or a block from editing, at the discretion of uninvolved administrators.
If, as it appears, you are unable to follow the ANI discussion or comprehend why you were topic banned, I recommend that you simply abide by the ban, as any attempt to appeal it by arguing that the decision is not based on any evidence is likely to result in you being permanently blocked from editing on the grounds that you lack the competence required to do so. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I've blocked you for disruptive behavior. Specifically, filing, and continuing to engage in after being counseled not to, a vexatious request for arbitration. Generally, for engaging in disruptive behavior with respect to the X-ray computed tomography. I will unblock you when you agree to the following:

1. That you will abide by the topic ban enacted at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive759#User:Nenpog;
2. That you will not seek a review of the topic ban for a period of at least one year;
3. That you will not initiate dispute resolution discussions concerning the editors who participated in the ANI dispute or whom you have listed at the request for arbitration.

If you desire to be unblocked, you may indicate your assent to the above here as I am watching your talk page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 01:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFAR request rejected

[edit]

Per this, the RFAR request that you were listed as a party in was rejected and closed. - Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 12:28, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violation

[edit]

This edit is a violation of your topic ban, described here, in which you are "topic-banned from posting any material related to medical imaging or ionizing radiation, broadly construed, anywhere on Wikipedia."

The edit has been undone, and your ability to edit this talk page has been withdrawn as you were abusing it to violate your topic ban. If you wish to request an unblock – and such a request is likely to be successful only if you agree to comply with MBisanz's conditions above – you may do so by emailing an administrator, or by filing a request through the Unblock Ticket Request System. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]