User talk:Marumari
I've installed PHPA on the server. It hasn't exploded yet. ;) After it's run for a bit I'll compare load / pages served before and after and see if it's helping. --Brion
- why do you use a user name so different from your email name ? That's very confusing :-) What is the history of your user name ? It sounds asian. Mine is there
Ok. That's a nice origin. Tough user name to remember right though :). See ya. Ant
POOF, you're a sysop. --LDC
Suit yourself, remove it if you wish. I had thought that the article could benefit from a photo of the species as it is seen in nature, since such animals are far more common than the relative handful of pets. I try to avoid layout and copy editing because I do not have the talent or the knowledge for them; the photo is one I had in the drawer that I thought could be of some use.
Kat 20:04, 5 Aug 2003 (UTC)
I thought you could ban user accounts? It wasn't the ip address that was a problem. It was the user account "User:67.121.169.17 (Michael)." MB 15:27, Aug 6, 2003 (UTC)
Hi there,
Just noticed your alogia entry (which is great by the way). You might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychopathology which really just involves adding Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychopathology/Review to your watch list and checking out any new entries that get added, or perhaps adding any to the list that you create.
Cheers - Vaughan 21:16, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Hello again,
From my talk page:
Should I add the articles I have done to Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychopathology, or just new ones in the future?
Either is fine, and thanks for adding the entries ! I'm away at the moment but I'll look forward to reading them through when I get back and have more wiki time. - Vaughan 15:41, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Minneapolis meetup
[edit]Hello Marumari. I'm contacting you since you are listed at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Minnesota. I'm going to be at a conference in Minneapolis and am planning a Wikipedia meetup for October 8. If you are near Minneapolis at that time, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Minneapolis. Angela. 20:50, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Dead External Links
[edit]Hi there. I've been contributing to this project and was thinking that it might be time to have a more up-to-date list to work on. It's just an idea though - it's not like we're running out of dead links to fix or anything. --Spondoolicks 17:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Totally Unrelated Roller Derby Question
[edit]...you coming to the Dust Devil? Onlyemarie 08:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- I can't make it this year, sigh. I'm moving to San Francisco in June, and I need to save all the money I can. My league isn't a member of the WFTDA anyways (long story) so I wouldn't be able to skate, anyways. :( But the Bay Area Derby Girls are, so hopefully next year, I'll be able to skate in the tourney. -- Marumari 15:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Dead external links
[edit]Hello there, Do you think you would have time to regenerate the files for the dead external links project? Not that we finished them all, but they are feeling a little stale. Thanks so much Open2universe 12:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Could you please help me
[edit]If you would please take a few moments and help me understand why you created the ciswoman and cisman redirect pages...
What was the motivation/logic behind creating them? What is the source of a definition for the words that made you link them to cisgender? —Preceding unsigned comment added by FemVoice (talk • contribs) 15:35, 11 June 2006
Further Help Changing a Username
[edit]I've had an ongoing issue with changing my username here on Wikipedia and was recently pointed to contact a developer. All of the information about the case can be found here [[1]] and here [[2]] but allow me to quickly summarize. I registered the account user:Mvelinder awhile ago but I failed to associate an email address with the account, taking away the possibility of me being able to retrieve it. I'm hoping a developer can finally resolve this issue for me and allow me to remain consistent with usernames across the internet by reverting back to my old account of user:Mvelinder. So in the end, I'm asking for the username of user:Mvelinder2 to be changed to user:Mvelinder. Thanks for the help. Mvelinder2 21:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I was able to contact an admin who resolved the issue for me. Thanks to everyone who helped. Issue resolved, feel free to archive this. Mvelinder 15:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedian Rollergirls
[edit]I removed the roller derby article from that category, which is just for Wikipedia users who are rollergirls. We could make it a 'See also', though. If you do that, put a colon in front of it, like this: * [[:Category:Wikipedian RollerGirls]]
. That will cause it to link to the category rather than making the article be in the category. —mjb 00:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I'll think about how I want to approach this a while, and either leave it out or move it elsewhere. -- Marumari 01:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- One thing I haven't gotten around to is linking to the various derby related Y! Groups, other than bankedtracknews… do you want to do that? Also, I'm working with Cat O'Ninetails on the DMOZ links. You wouldn't happen to have an editor account on there, would you? We could use some help… before we ask about the right way to set up a regional hierarchy, we need to get the descriptions of each league site updated to indicate what kind of content is on that site. There are a lot of sites to check; I added a ton of them somewhat blindly, just making sure they loaded but not reviewing their content. —mjb 01:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Nice Photos
[edit]Hi Marumari!
Nice to see your addition to FPC, I've had a look through your other pix and they look pretty good! These are my favs: Image:Swallowtail dying.jpg, Image:Pivoting king vulture.jpg, Image:Mexican wolf lounging.jpg (I'd even try feature the mexican wolf one). Well done, but I wonder if I could ask you to upload in higher res? Thanks, --Fir0002 06:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Question
[edit]If I uploaded Image:Floating on water.jpg to the Diffraction article, would you support? BTW, what caption should I add if i were to put it on that article?Nnfolz 22:01, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Flotation devices
[edit]Just have to say that that comment brightened up my day. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Once again, breasts cheer up another person's day. They are such enthusiastic little critters! --Marumari 14:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- And that was almost better. Have a nice one, although I can't. It's 100F over here... —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Zebra Heliconian
[edit]Marumari - I'm getting ready to nominate your Zebra Heliconian image. Given the current tension on the FPC page and my tendency to be a stickler on image quality, I have a feeling any nomination I make will be heavily scrutinized by some of the participants. I have no problem with 1000 pixel images -- all of mine were 1000x667 originally, until I was strongly encouraged to go larger. I just think it would be prudent to go a little bigger with your Zebra Heliconian image prior to nomination, especially given the comments made about the resolution of your Mexican Wolf image.
Also, I'm thinking it could be improved with a bit of edge sharpening. If you'd like, I could give it a go... just supply me with a file to work from. (I can handle pretty much any format, RAW included.) If the thought of somebody else working on your images bothers you, then just let me know if you will be making a bigger version available. Thanks... -- moondigger 22:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- BTW, I've been moving this week (and for the next week or so.) Let's deal with the Zebra Heliconian thing when I get back. Thanks! --Marumari 13:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. Life has been kind of crazy for me lately, and I've only had time to contribute a few comments here and there on the FPC page. I will be away from Wikipedia for a while starting tomorrow (July 29); when I return I'll nominate your photo if it hasn't already been nominated. Again, sorry about the lack of communication. -- Moondigger 14:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Featured Picture
[edit]Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Mexican wolf lounging.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
|
Congratulations, and thanks for taking it for us. Raven4x4x 09:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
This is to let you know the Featured Picture you uploaded and/or nominated Image:Mexican wolf lounging.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the day on September 23, 2006, when it will be featured on the Main Page. Congratulations! howcheng {chat} 17:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi! You supported the Hummingbird Hawk-moth FPC (like everyone else who commented), but HighInBC uploaded an edit that absolutely no-one commented on. I can't promote the image without knowing which version to promote, so now I have to ask everyone which version they prefer. Would you mind specifying which image you are supporting? Thanks. Raven4x4x 09:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Move / Zebra heliconian nom
[edit]So, are you around? How did the move go? I'd like to nominate your Zebra heliconian shot as a featured picture soon. As previously mentioned, you're likely to see some resistance to a 1000-pixel wide image. (I'm seeing some resistance to a 1200 pixel image right now.) Any chance you could upload a larger version, maybe with some edge sharpening applied? There's a good page about various sharpening techniques here (scroll almost to the bottom of the page to find the section on edge sharpening): http://www.bythom.com/sharpening.htm -- Moondigger 20:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Glad to hear the move went well. I can handle pretty much any format, PNG, PSD, TIFF, RAW, whatever - so send a file if you want to. My e-mail address registered here works fine. Otherwise I can nominate it later, when you're fully unpacked and set up. I just didn't want you to think I forgot about it. -- Moondigger 00:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Dead external links
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you seem to have taken a major role in Wikipedia:Dead external links. Are you still involved in this? This project is still working off a database dump from 8 months ago, which is ancient by wikipedia standards, wikipedia has almost doubled in size since then. Any chance of your updating this? I was thinking of doing some work on the dead links, but I'd really rather be working off an up to date list. --Xyzzyplugh 20:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Minnesota meetup
[edit]A meetup of Wikipedians in Minnesota is proposed: please stop by the discussion page if interested. Jonathunder 02:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reminder: Meetup October 29, one o'clock, Mall of America. Jonathunder 16:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late notice, but there is a change within the mall for the meetup location today: see this page. Jonathunder 15:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
It was good meeting you the other day. I hope we can get together again soon - maybe in a place where it's easier to talk. Your photography is awesome! Appraiser 04:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi back!
[edit]Hi there! It's so funny you stumbled across my user page; just a few days before I had stumbled across *yours*! It was so nice of you to introduce yourself! It does seem like there aren't many of us. Nice to know there's another Minnesota woman around. :) BTW, I found your page because I LOVE your Mexican wolf featured picture. (I like to check out the MN Zoo pics when I see them.) It is just gorgeous! Thanks again for the greeting; hello back! Estreya 14:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- It was really a pleasure to meet you today! Seemed like a whirlwind meetup and I didn't really have enough time to get to chat with everyone I would have liked to. I hope we can get together again to talk more sometime! Seems like we have a lot in common. ;) Estreya 00:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
That Blue Jay Picture Of Yours . . .
[edit]Hi Marumari -
This is User: I The Bluejay and I just wanted to ask permission for that bluejay picture you took. I'm rather new and I'm afraid the other admin are out to get me, so I thought asking permission would be a safe route. Thanks and please feel free to talk to me anytime.
I The Bluejay
Discussion about Congress
[edit]Would you be so kind as to go here and weigh in on the discussion? Thanks --Appraiser 15:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Sidebar redesign
[edit]Hello Marumari! Since you're a developer and everything, I was wondering if you could let me know about the feasibility of a sidebar redesign? — Jack · talk · 03:16, Monday, 19 March 2007
FYi
[edit]FYI Minnesota RollerGirls got created, and could use some work. -Ravedave 03:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi! I'm wondering why you added the notability tag. It clearly seems to qualify to me. --Appraiser 20:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Wow, nice photo! How fun. -Susanlesch 00:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my user page. I'll feel free to pillage the article Minnesota RollerGirls at will now. I noticed your user page when there was still a category for rollergirl wikipedians. For an administrator you seem okay.Michael J Swassing 04:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my user page, too! The MNRG article looks good. You asked for some feedback, so here are a few minor suggestions:
- Wikify the dates in the table
- Avoid redirects in wikilinks for LLC and city+state combos
- Italicize newspaper/magazine names
- Use en dash in scores and win-loss records
I suggest changing the Teams section to qualify that it's "as of 2007" (since there are no references). Did they always have 4 teams, or did they start with two and add two later?
Who founded the league? Were there any splits?
For its LLC status you can use this URL as a reference, but the not-for-profit philosophy is more difficult to verify. I'd add a "According to the league's Web site…" to any such claim, if you can't find a reference for 501(c) tax-exempt status or a disclosure of the league's articles of organization, since normally Minnesota Statute 322B.326 would apply, which says that an LLC's profits and losses are distributed among the corporation's members.
The sentence Playing and practicing at the Roy Wilkins Auditorium since 2005, spectator attendance levels average 2000 has a grammar problem: it sounds like the attendance levels were playing and practicing. Also, "levels" is superfluous. I would say Since 2005, the league has played and practiced at the Roy Wilkins Auditorium, where spectator attendance averages around 2,000 per bout.
In the phrase help benefit women, "help" is superfluous.
There are 80 skaters on the roster, and the league "is composed of" four home teams with max. 20 players each, but are there additional Minnesota RollerGirls-in-training who are not on teams? Or is everyone in the organization on a team?
Does the all-star team have a name?
The all-star team's record is given from the beginning of '06, but did they play before that, too? If not, instead of Since the beginning of 2006, I'd say Since the team's formation at the beginning of 2006.
Near the end of the roller derby article, there's a mention of the Right Guard and Aleve commercials. Can you please add the Coca-Cola/NASCAR commercial to that same list item? Thanks!
That should do ya. :) —mjb 18:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh, here's another issue: the home teams have been playing interleague bouts. The article currently implies that only the interleague team does that.
The ones I know about:
- June 16, 2007: Cincinnati Rollergirls All-Stars 140, MNRG Garda Belts 121
- October 20, 2007: MNRG Dagger Dolls 80, No Coast Derby Girls Hood Ratz 26
- October 20, 2007: Cincinnati Rollergirls All-Stars 119, MNRG Garda Belts 51
- November 10, 2007: Denver Roller Dolls Mile High Club 117, MNRG Atomic Bombshells 71
- November 10, 2007: Duke City 81, MNRG Rockits 76
You should clarify that the table covers only the interleague games played by the all-star team (is that correct?) or add these other games in. —mjb 18:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Article to be deleted
[edit]Emily Hagins' article will probably be deleted. Please weigh in here if you are interested. Thanks.--Appraiser 20:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Category
[edit]Category:Wikipedian RollerGirls is up for deletion. As you are one of the 2 members of that category, you may wish to comment at [3]DGG (talk) 07:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Meetup RSVP
[edit]- We missed you at the Meetup; next time we'll have to check your soccer schedule :)--Appraiser 21:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're going to make me blush. A B-class means "A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic." (from Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment) I think it qualifies.--Appraiser 22:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Portal:Minnesota
[edit]Portal:Minnesota is at Wikipedia:Featured_portal_candidates if you can find a minute to vote. From memory, you are both an administrator (someone with knowledge of Wikipedia), and a member of WikiProject Minnesota (someone on the list of participants). The most recent portal promotions had only a few more votes than Minnesota has now. Thank you kindly. -Susanlesch (talk) 01:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
How's your soccer schedule looking? It would be good to see. you.--Appraiser (talk) 17:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Minneapolis Meetups
[edit]Town Hall Brewery maps.google.com 1430 Washington Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55454 (612) 339-8696 October 11, 2008 Saturday at 12:00 noon (midday) Meetup RSVP
Muddy Waters maps.google.com 2401 Lyndale Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55405 (612) 872-2232 October 10, 2008 Friday at 10:00 PM (at night) Alternate meetup RSVP
Hope you can make it. Feel free to pass along these invitations. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Minnesota Meetup
[edit]- Update: the meetup will be at 1 p.m. Sunday, October 11, in St. Paul. Click here for more details and to R.S.V.P. Jonathunder (talk)
Hello Marumari,
is it ok for you if I transfer this image to commons? It's a nice shot and would be useful on other wiki-projects too...
Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 07:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Meetup
[edit]Hello, April. Discussion of a 2010 Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup has begun. Please see the talk page. Jonathunder (talk) 23:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
In the area? You're invited to the | |
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting | |
Date: 31 October 2010 | |
Time: noon | |
Place: Midtown Exchange Global Market, East Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 44°56′57″N 93°15′40″W / 44.9493°N 93.2612°W | |
Suggestions for next Minnesota meetup?
[edit]Hi, April, do you have any suggestions for a next date or place for a Minnesota meetup? I was disappointed to miss last Sunday's meetup once a work meeting coincided with the time announced for the meetup. I would be happy to arrange a meetup soon. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
November Minnesota Meetup
[edit]In the area? You're invited to the | |
May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting | |
Date: Saturday, 20 November 2010 | |
Time: 1:00 - 3:30 (click here for full agenda) R.S.V.P. by Nov. 17 for free lunch + parking | |
Place: Minnesota History Center 345 Kellogg Blvd, St. Paul, Minnesota 44°57′00″N 93°06′20″W / 44.95°N 93.1055°W | |
Edit-a-thon at Hennepin County Library
[edit]- Minneapolis History edit-a-thon
The Minnesota Wikipedia community and local historians are invited to edit entries in Wikipedia on Minneapolis history. Please help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by utilizing materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own Minneapolis History topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections Librarians.
Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
When: Saturday, February 25, 2012, 10-5 pm
10 am - 11 am Orientation to Minneapolis Collection
11 am - 5 pm Edit-a-thon
Website: Hennepin County Library, Special Collections, Map & Directions
Parking: Metered street parking or pay ramp in basement, enter on 4th Ave
For more information see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota#2012. —innotata 00:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Loves Libraries event
[edit]In the area? You are invited to Wikipedia Loves Libraries in Minneapolis.
Hennepin County Library's Special Collections is hosting a Minneapolis history editathon on November 3. Help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by using materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections librarians.
There will also be an intro for people new to Wikipedia, and tours of Special Collections.
Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
When: 10am-4:30pm, Saturday, November 3, 2012
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page. —innotata 14:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Upcoming Wikipedia meetups
[edit]In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetups.
To kick-off monthly meetups in the Twin Cities, two events will be held in Special Collections at Minneapolis Central Library this summer. These are mostly planned as opportunities for Wikipedians to discuss editing, but all are welcome!
Special Collections contains many valuable historical resources, including the Minneapolis Collection, consisting of files on hundreds of topics related to Minneapolis from neighborhoods to politicians (it's best to call or email in advance to request materials). Free wifi and several public computers are available.
Place: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
Dates: Saturday, June 1
Saturday, July 6
Time: 12:30pm–2:30pm+
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 14:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Great American Wiknic
[edit]In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.
Place: north of Minnehaha Falls in Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, June 22, 2012
Time: 12–4 pm
- Accessible from the Minnehaha Park METRO station, bus, walk, bike, or car
- If driving, free parking available on 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
- Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!
For more, and to sign up (encouraged, not required) go to the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 03:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup on August 3
[edit]In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota monthly meetup on August 3.
Place: Lavvu Coffee House
813 4th St SE, Minneapolis 55414
Date: Saturday, August 3
Time: 1:00pm-3:00pm+
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list.
—innotata 23:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day Meetup on January 18
[edit]In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetup in commemoration of Wikipedia Day.
- Place: Seward Cafe
- 2129 E Franklin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55404
- Date: Saturday, January 18, 2014
- Time: noon
- Place: Seward Cafe
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 04:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment
[edit]Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Invite to the Minneapolis Institute of Art
[edit]Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Invite to an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center
[edit]The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
- We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, gobonobo + c 23:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
[edit]
Hello, Marumari. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
[edit]Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
[edit]Hi Marumari.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Marumari. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Marumari. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hiya!
[edit]I have fixed a typo on your userpage. Hope you don't mind. Please forgive me. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Totally fine, thank you so much! Marumari (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Is the link to your website a bit outdated? The current domain seems to be "poke in the I/O". (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed, thanks for that. Also touched it up a bunch. Marumari (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- Is the link to your website a bit outdated? The current domain seems to be "poke in the I/O". (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
[edit]Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
[edit]ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
[edit]Dear Marumari,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
[edit]A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
[edit]Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
[edit]
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the updates. Marumari (talk) 15:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:56, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 02:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)