User talk:Shajith04

HELLO MY NAME IS SHAJITH PADDIYALINGAM I AM 12 YEARS OLD, AND I GO TO A SCHOOOL CALLED HAZELWICK. MY MUMS NAME IS SHANTHINIDEVI AND MY DADS NAME IS PADDIYLINGAM. MY FAVOURITE SPORTS IS FOOTBALL MY FAVOURITE FOOTBALL TEAM IS MANCHESTER UNITED THEY RULE. MY FRIENDS NAMES ARE KOWSHIHAN,NIRUBAN,LAKSHAN,SERAN,VIPULAN,JAY. THAT ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ME!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!.§§§§§§♫♫♫♫♫☺☺

Image tagging for Image:Player-image-2820.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Player-image-2820.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC) i love my dick —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.177.207 (talk) 18:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Player-image-2820.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Player-image-2820.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Player-image-2820.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Player-image-2820.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Kuruvi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kuruvi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! The Helpful One ^(Talk)^{(Contributions)} 13:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kuruvi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Kuruvi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! The Helpful One ^(Talk)^{(Contributions)} 13:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Royal

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Jerry Royal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jerry Royal

A tag has been placed on Jerry Royal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Jerry Royal, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. No more pages about your friends, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Cuyler91093 - Соитяівцтіоиѕ 21:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Speedy deletion nomination of Arun Youth

A tag has been placed on Arun Youth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roudhram

The article Roudhram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced future film violates WP:Crystal

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lojithan Nallathamby

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lojithan Nallathamby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vrenator (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not vandalize or you will be prevented from editing. Lupo 13:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Osama bin Laden, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dark Prime (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]