User talk:TeeEmCee
Welcome!
Hello, TeeEmCee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 19:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm Zppix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gödel Prize, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 12:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
@Zppix:: I feel you are being too aggressive in reverting edits. I did not cite that addition because NONE of the text in the body of the page has 'ref' links to the citations section, yet the citations section is otherwise pretty good, and I got the $5000 figure from the existing citations (it's easy to find in multiple of them). So I just cited a random one. The referencing could be improved, but I don't think that should preclude other edits. --TeeEmCee (talk) 11:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you feel that way but I also do know that it is policy to provide references or challenged material can/will be removed. Citing random sources doesn't only hurt the edit but it is also not related to the material to which is being challenged.--Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 13:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Zppix:: I meant that several of the sources contain that information, so I picked one randomly. --TeeEmCee (talk) 13:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)