User talk:Ramapith
And here are several pages on what to avoid:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the Stuff to do
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.) Fix spelling and grammar
Fix wikilinks
Update with new information
Expand short articles
Check and add references
Fix original research issues
Improve lead sections
Add an image
Translate and clean up
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women. Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality. Click here
to reply to this message. This welcome message was sent by Cinemaniac at 02:09, January 22, 2008 (UTC) |
Floyd Gottfredson Library/Walt Disney's Mickey Mouse
[edit]Hi! If you really are David Gerstein, I'm happy to be talking to you! I just recently got the slipcase of the first two volumes of the Mickey Mouse books, and I'm still working my way through them.
The issue is on the Walt Disney's Mickey Mouse isn't about whether what you wrote was true or not, but whether it's verifiable under Wikipedia's verifiability guidelines (to quote, "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."). What you included may indeed be true (and I certainly don't doubt your word), but without citing a reliable reference, anything you added could (and in fact should) be challenged and deleted if it can't be backed up (especially when it's an IP address versus an actual publication). Unfortunately, the only source I had was the Christian Science Monitor one when I threw the page together (which was linked to right from Fantagraphics' page on the Mickey Mouse books—if the source is mistaken, Fantagraphics has done part of the job of spreading the mistake around). If you can point me to a reliable source talking about the other European reprint collections, I'd be more than happy to work them into the reference section (or you could do it yourself, of course). For the time being, since it's disputed, and it's pretty clear to me that you're right, I'm just going to delete the line about previous collections (or supposed lack thereof) until a good enough source can be dug up. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 12:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- I certainly get a lot of hits on Google for GLi Anni D'Oro di Topolino, but unfortunately, in English they're entirely Amazon/eBay/message board hits...not a single review or other citable source in English...
- Oh, and if the Christian Science Monitor has got their facts wrong, don't you think it'd be a good idea to contact them and get them to fix it? CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 12:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. You seem to have replied to this on User talk:Cinemaniac than than my talk page for some reason. I just noticed it, coming by here to see if you were still active. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 08:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- I've gone and made the changes to the page, and added the three references you provided. Please let me know if there's something I could do better. I'm no Disney expert. I just got the books in the mail, and noticed there was no Wiki page on them, so I threw one together with whatever citations I could quickly find. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 11:11, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Ramapith. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ramapith. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ramapith. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Long time
[edit]Hi David -- I don't know if you remember me, but I'm Danny Horn, we met a while ago. I decided this month that I was sick of the poor coverage of Disney comics, so I've been making pages for the comic strips, and I'm currently putting an article together about Mickey Mouse Magazine. It's cool to see you here, I didn't realize you were on Wikipedia. Anyway, hi. -- Toughpigs (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit] Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Horace Horsecollar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 21:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)