Jump to content

Talk:1st & Ten (1984 TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article assessment

[edit]

I have rated this article as stub class because of the relatively short length and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other articles about television series. --Opark 77 15:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for whatever little it's worth, I added a few interesting bits, to go with the obvious point that it had OJ in it: it also had the inexcusabl... i mean, loveable Ogre, from Revenge of the Nerds, and veteran master Reid Shelton somehow managing to save a few scenes (thank God!). Also, as i recall, it was the first real attempt by a cable biggie to grab some sit-com audience by simply including incredibly pointless Gratuititties and a few "shit"s and "screw you"s (no "fuck" that i've heard). Hows that for a great source, huh? "as i recall". quote me on that. or delete it, if you're feeling anal; i'll understand. but maybe, like the magic of a California Bulls season, someone will go find a decent reference for the fact, and make us both happy! But, I doubt it. :D peace ya'll. Eaglizard (talk) 07:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In response to myself, I just realised (reading imdb), this show was very probably the very first show on television to actually picture two nude men together and imply they were doin' it. "Um.. he's a tight end...", he says. No, really, that's the actual line. And Delta says "I'll just bet he is." It's pretty bad, really. imho, this show is pretty awful. but gawd i had such a crush on Delta Burke. well, and it was 5 bucks at Wally Worl.. I mean, Wal-Mart for all 80 friggen episodes. :D) anyways, i won't add this point about the nude men, 'cause i really don't much care. and i really would want a better reference for that :) Eaglizard (talk) 07:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1st & Ten (1984 TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]