Jump to content

Talk:2007 Laotian coup d'état conspiracy allegation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality Act

[edit]

The article describes the alleged support for a coup in Laos as a violation of the Neutrality Act. Yet that article, to which the reader is directed, indicates that neutrality policies ended when the US entered WWII in 1941. If the Neutrality Act or parts thereof remain in force, perhaps this article should explain that.--72.155.121.7 (talk) 13:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Comments

[edit]

This article appears to deliberately lack NPOV. An "alleged" crime or a "planned" crime is not the same as an "attempted" crime. Under U.S. law, an individual is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Allowing misinformation and propaganda to creep into articles like this cheapens the entire project. Let's work together to focus on NPOV edits, otherwise, this article should be deleted pending determination of whether or not the alleged conspiracy really happened. Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 19:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make it clear, I oppose deletion of this article, speedily or otherwise. The article is an important event, albeit current and in a state of flux, that is of significant historical value. Wikipedia is not here to "determin[e] whether or not the alleged conspiracy really happened" but to publish information (through reliable, 3rd parties) on the matter.
And I would disagree that the "article appears to deliberately lack NPOV." There are numerous instances of the transitive verb "alleged" is used, and the title mimics that of other similar articles; if the article is subpar, by all means change it (that is working together), but please don't judge my intentions (you are wrong.) Int21h (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007 Laotian coup d'état conspiracy allegation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]