Talk:2024 Sugar Bowl

bracket

will anyone create the bracket for the college football playoff this year? michigan, washington, texas, and alabama are in. KameronS333 (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

game summary

will anyone do the game summary for the sugar bowl? KameronS333 (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 talk 13:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Washington became the first team from the Pac-12 Conference to participate in the Sugar Bowl when they did so in 2024? Source: Associated Press
  • ALT1: ... that Washington's participation in the 2024 Sugar Bowl marked the first appearance of any Pac-12 Conference team in the Sugar Bowl? Source: same as ALT0
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Shapez 2
  • Comment: 2,347 B → 13 kB

5x expanded by PCN02WPS (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 78 past nominations.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC).

• Not a full review, but a UW Sugar Bowl media guide being used as a source on a non-routine claim about itself doesn't sound right to me. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  • @Theleekycauldron: Replaced with AP source. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
    • full review needed :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
• Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Awaiting QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

• • @BeanieFan11: thanks for the review! QPQ has been added. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 13:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
    • BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)