Jump to content

Talk:MPP+

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Si196210. Peer reviewers: Si196210.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion/ expanding information

[edit]

I guess this article needs to be improved or expanded at least . There are new informations about MPP+ out there with great works . Such as those drugs that counteract MPP+ effect on DA degenerations as PD modal organism. And putting more references. That way it will be more valuable than just having a couple sentences. Si196210 (talk) 00:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279717301527 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.7.22.202 (talk) 09:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

is there info regarding its use as herbicide?

[edit]

do we know something about MPP+/cyperquat use (or abandoned use) in agriculture?

it is mentioned as a herbicide at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPTP (by the name: cyperquat, which redirects here), but its described toxicity would suggest that it is either out of use or under strict regulation. all that, however is just my speculation.

now i see that "it is structurally similar to paraquat" and probably what i was asking is covered there. still, does structural similarity mean something like left/right rotating molecule, or maybe i am missing the point? and perhaps paraquat and cyperquat have different uses/regulations/or toxicity, so maybe theres still room to expand and improve this article. 176.63.176.112 (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Erroneous safety citation?

[edit]

In the safety section, source 11 is cited as saying that MPP+ is not toxic via the listed routes of administration, while other sources seem to suggest this, the cited source itself does not appear to. Exilehide (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]