Talk:Rough cut
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Original research?
[edit]The "Use in non-linear video editing" section seems a lot like either original research or a copy and paste job. It also doesn't give enough background information to make it relevant to the article or to someone unfamiliar with non-linear editing. I think the whole section should be rewritten.
- I'm not so certain. It certainly looks sloppy and needs a thorough cleanup, but nothing that I see written seems to be original research; I would presume that a copyvio can be easily googled for. In any case, it is worth pointing out that the article has issues and needs a lot of work. Girolamo Savonarola 20:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Fine cut
[edit]Many filmmakers also include a stage that they call the "Fine Cut" which fits roughly between the rough cut and the final cut. I'm only speaking from experience as a filmmaker myself here and don't want to get flagged for original research, so could someone source this out and write it in? 130.132.151.232 (talk) 21:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)