Jump to content

Talk:Roxane Mesquida

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Roxane Mesquida.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Roxane Mesquida.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Birth year vandalism

[edit]

Just curious: why do some people derive pleasure from switching her birth year to 1981? According to IMDB it's 1986. Which would correctly make her 14 when Fat Girl was filmed in 2000. Fnordware (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, spoke too soon. More recent US articles do indicate she was born in 1981. Good to know that she was at least 18 when she did nude scenes in Fat Girl. IMDB is wrong. Fnordware (talk) 04:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's examine the birth year evidence, shall we?

1986:
1981:

That link to her "Passport scan" should be deleted as it's revealing Roxane Mesquida's private information on a public website - not to mention publishing an unauthorized government document - which would be illegal in most countries. Maybe it can be emailed to be reviewed and discussed with management for possible future changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.73.121.201 (talk) 22:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got a Wikipedia policy link? I don't think that rule would apply to a talk page or where I got it from: a comment in the change log. Seems like the site that could face legal action would be the company hosting the image, not Wikipedia. Fnordware (talk) 23:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]