Jump to content

Talk:Spafford Farm massacre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSpafford Farm massacre has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 12, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 6, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that one of the survivors of the Spafford Farm massacre (memorial pictured) hid in the forest for days after the attack because he erroneously thought that a local fort was overtaken by the Menominee?
Current status: Good article

GA pass

[edit]

It now passes all the criteria. I did a copyedit. The depth of coverage is fine for an incident involving around a dozen people, and is written in NPOV NOR manner with proper sources and MOS. I do think that there seems to be a contradiction in the numbers in the infobox and the main text though. This error (typo?) needs to be rectified. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Conflicts, battles and military exercises" articles. I realize that the article was passed just a few weeks ago, but I'm going through all of the Conflicts articles so I might as well make sure the article still has its high quality. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I made a few minor corrections, but there were no major problems with the article. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have edited the article history to reflect this review. Regards, --Nehrams2020 23:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]