Talk:Suburban Legends (song)

GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.

This article is a candidate to become part of the "1989 (Taylor's Version)" series, a current good topic. A good topic should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.

Suburban Legends (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 27, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Suburban Legends (song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 29 May 2024 by reviewer HitroMilanese (talk · contribs).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.billboard.com/lists/taylor-swift-1989-taylors-version-easter-eggs/now-that-we-dont-talk-2/

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Suburban Legends (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 14:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · contribs) 15:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Prose

"The re-recordings featured tracks from the sessions she had eschewed from their originals" this reads weird, do you simply mean "original sessions"?

Verifiability

In-line citations, good, appropriate templates used. Fifteen spot checks done, they are all fine with the exception of the re-recording claim. As of publication of Jem Aswad's Variety piece, we aren't certain Swift actually began re-recording albums 1–5 in November 2020. It seems to be an announcement she could do that rather than what the article currently implies.

Excellent work! I only have two items to nitpick so far. Please clarify these concerns and so I can hopefully pass the nomination. Cheers Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 11:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing this, @Dora the Axe-plorer! I'll address your points sometime this week. Gained (talk) 08:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @Dora the Axe-plorer! I have addressed the points you made. Gained (talk) 10:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gained, thanks for addressing the points. I will go ahead and pass this nomination. Cheers! Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]