Jump to content

Talk:The Tales of Beedle the Bard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articleThe Tales of Beedle the Bard has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 30, 2007Articles for deletionMerged
June 23, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
July 10, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 6, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

too long?

[edit]

Im pretty sure this page could be narrowed down a lot!!! What do you think? (and by you Im addressing everybody reading this page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asmym xix (talkcontribs) 04:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of too long, has anyone commented on the obvious, elephant-in-the-room fact that a book that is intended as an in-universe stand-in for Grimm's Fairy Tales is totally unbelievable if presenting a mere five or six or so fairy-tales?--2001:A61:260D:6E01:4506:68F3:AE30:F562 (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason to interpret it as a close analog to Grimm's collection, except in the limited sense that it's evidently a classic. --Pi zero (talk) 22:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Tales of Beedle the Bard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]