Jump to content

Talk:Alcatel Mobile

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

This article seems slightly biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.221.105 (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biased, copypasted, incomplete. Not much information on this company anyway, but it could be better. 123.176.119.19 (talk) 06:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The homepage is actually not accessible. It's timing out Flowright138 (talk) 11:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@ 190.173.116.156 (talk) 03:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move? (11 March 2015)

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) -- Calidum 03:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


We also need to take the WP:MOSTM and WP:ALLCAPS into account.--64.229.166.35 (talk) 19:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Historical Alcatel mobile telephones

[edit]

Alcatel has been making mobile telephones for quite some time now prior to this joint venture, but there doesn't seem to be a page on it, is that due to notability or does it have another reason? --Lumia930uploader (talk) 09:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alcatel is now the new name of Alcatel Mobile Phones

[edit]

Alcatel mobile phone should redirect here. But I propose to create a new Alcatel page for the historic french company before it merged with Lucent to form Alcatel-Lucent (now Nokia).--Xaviateur (talk) 06:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alcatel Watch

[edit]

There is a red hyperlink for Alcatel Watch. I don't think it is a noteworthy product to have a (currently non-existent) article for it. Could this red hyperlink be removed from the article please? 86.22.34.211 (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]