Jump to content

Talk:Cationic polymerization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Our outline for this page can be viewed at User:UMChemProfessor/Chem538W11Grp1 sandbox (MatChem121 (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

My partner User:Pharmscistudent and I (MatChem121) will be updating this page for a class project this semester. The final page will be uploaded in April 2011. We plan to reorganize the page and add information on kinetics, synthesis and a variety of other details. We will post our outline soon. MatChem121 (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cationic polymerization is a topic of mid-level importance in polymer chemistry; although I'm leaving it as a stub, I believe it's definitely worth having and expanding the page. Anionic addition polymerization has a fairly thorough page, and although cationic is less common, it should still merit coverage on Wikipedia. BlyumJ (talk) 18:09, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still working on this - give me an hour. BlyumJ (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy based upon the expansion you made, and i see no further issues that would warrant a tag. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Effect of Temperature

[edit]

In the effect of temperature portion of the article, I'm editing the sentence which states that "since Ep is small compared to Ei and Et, the activation energy is effectively negative" In reality, the reason for the apparent negative activation energy is because Et is apparently much larger than Ei+Ep. Therefore in the equation, E=Ei+Ep-Et, since Et is large, E is negative. Ep being small has not very much to do with E being negative because Ep could be very small, but if Ei and Et were equal, E would be positive. Point being, Et being large has more of an effect on E than Ep being small. Mr.PolyIB (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Mr.PolyIB[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cationic polymerization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]