Jump to content

Talk:Jan Mazurkiewicz/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk · contribs) 19:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Prose is good throughout.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    The article maintains a good style throughout.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    References are reliable sources and well placed.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    The article covers the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    It maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    All images are within the public domain.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Informative captions are used. Consider moving the names of those in each photograph to separate footnotes.
  7. Overall: A very interesting read. Well done. Harrison49 (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass or Fail: