Jump to content

Talk:Jiaolong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jiaolong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation format

[edit]

Hi, Kiyoweap, thanks for your improvements to this article. However, I wish you had known about the WP:CITEVAR convention and first discussed changing the existing in-line Harvard citations to footnotes. What would be the easiest way to revert the footnoting while keeping your other edits? Keahapana (talk) 00:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keahapana. Well, I did initially try to maintain your style of referencing. But just too many unreferenced material need[ed] fixing.
My judgment call was using footnote style in order to maintain readability within ordinary amount of effort. I think most reasonable editors would agree.
If you disagree, I suppose you can demonstrate by converting them to the citation style you want to preserve. I just don't see this as practicable.
But I am not about to remove material that are matters of WP:Verifiability and WP:No Original Research policy on grounds of a WP:CITEVAR guideline issues. --Kiyoweap (talk) 17:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]