Jump to content

Talk:Kat O

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kat OCrooked Island, Hong KongRelisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 04:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC) The official name of the island is Crooked Island. minghong (talk) 07:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

}}

Requested move 02 September 2014

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. —innotata 02:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kat OCrooked Island, Hong Kong – Crooked Island is the English name, and it is used more often in English sources when referring to the island as opposed to other features on the island. Bejnar (talk) 15:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC) --Bejnar (talk) 15:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose: "used more often in English" is certainly not obvious, seems like a personal perception. Probably something in the neighborhood of 50/50. Many Google results will return something like "Kat O, also known as Crooked Island". The exact same discussion was closed 3 years ago without consensus, and that was fine. The island hasn't moved and the name hasn't changed, and most people here certainly have no strong opinion either way. So let's keep the title of this article the way it has been since I have created it, 10 years ago. I would rather see people adding content than having a sterile discussion about which of the 2 names mentioned in the article should be the actual name of the article. Olivier (talk) 20:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This has been discussed previously. No new evidence is presented. Please make some effort to show evidence that this is the best name. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kat O. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]