The original content I created under "1971 East Central State Academicals: Manuwa/Adebajo Cup" meets Wikipedia's guidelines for notability, verifiability, and reliable sources. The move and deletion were done without proper consensus or discussion with me, the original creator.
Reason for review: The original title "1971 East Central State Academicals: Manuwa/Adebajo Cup" specifically highlights the important event and is more precise than the draft title. The reviewers created the title "Draft:1971 East Central State Academicals season" and added invalid content that does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines.
Attempts to resolve: I have tried discussing the matter with the reviewers on their talk pages, but we have not reached a resolution. I have also sought input from the article’s talk page but have not received a satisfactory response.
Administrative close. Deletion Review is not an appropriate forum to discuss a page move/draftification during new page review. There is no deletion decision to review. Discussion needs to take place on talk page. There is no evidence that the nominator discussed this on the other editors' talk pages either. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Close - I am not entirely sure what the filer is requesting, but it does not appear to be within the scope of Deletion Review. There may be three content issues, none of which are in scope of DRV:
1. The article was draftified. Either it can be submitted for AFC review, or it can be contested by unilaterally moving it back to article space, which can then in turn be contested by AFD.
2. The page was renamed. The title can be discussed on the draft talk page or article talk page, or it can be Moved, or a Requested Move can be used.
3. The filer says that the content in the draft is invalid. The content in a draft can be discussed by normal editing and draft talk page discussion. If the draft is moved back to article space, the content in an article can be discussed by normal editing and article talk page discussion.