Jump to content

Wikipedia:Editor review/OZOO

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OZOO[edit]

OZOO (talk · contribs) I have been editing Wikipedia for over two years now, but only really seriously since the start of 2007. I am intrested to know where my fellow editors think I could improve. OZOO 17:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • Wow, I can't believe it took this long for someone to review you, I wish I had more to say. I looked over your last 500 contributions, which are all from the time since you asked to be reviewed! Anyway, from what I can see, you are doing great. The articles you have created are well written and properly sourced, your interactions with other users, though somewhat slim, are entirely civil, and you have "exterminated" an awful lot of bad content from articles related to Doctor Who. I also like users who are willing to see other points of view and admit when the other guy is right, as you did here. I would suggest widening the scope of your activities, WikiProject Science Fiction could always use more help. There are also a lot of bio articles on footballers that are in pretty sad shape and could use an editor like yourself to help them out. All in all, I would say keep up the good work. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I recently created all the templates in Category:Doctor Who serials navbox templates. I also feel myself to have assisted in the fight against vandals.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I was involved in a minor conflict on Doctor Who story chronology with another editor with WP:OWN issues. This however, was not major. In future, I, like I feel everyone should, will try and deal with the situation calmly
  3. You submitted this a while ago, are you still interested in getting reviewed? delldot talk 14:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. --OZOO (Whaddya think, sirs?) 18:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I preferentially review people who have themselves given reviews. Have you done one or more? If so, can you link to it? That way I can use it as a guideline for how much detail I should go into in yours. (Drop me a note on my talk page if I miss this in my watchlist). delldot talk 14:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I have not yey done one. --OZOO (Whaddya think, sirs?) 18:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Let me know if you do one. delldot talk 16:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]