Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MJ0.6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MJ0.6[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advert, moved more than once from draft by obvious COI editor. Fails referencing, fails WP:NMUSIC, should not be draftified. Pure Vanispamcruftisement Fiddle Faddle 16:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 16:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NMUSIC + WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - massive rap sensation he is not. Zero coverage in the media, not even the usual paid-for press releases. The only evidence that this rapper even exists is a YouTube channel, in which most of the videos have fewer than 100 views. Not even remotely close to being notable. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Repeatedly declined draft moved into mainspace by an obvious COI editor, with no reliable sources; no indication that the subject meets either WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I deleted the sandbox version per WP:G11. WP:A7 also looks defensible. Delete as WP:ARTSPAM about a subject who does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, or WP:NMUSIC. The refbombing(?) just does not provide significant sourcing. I know the AfD admins like full, well thought out rationales, but there are only so many ways of saying subject does not meet inclusion requirementst. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no signs of being a notable musician and fails WP:GNG. WikiVirusC^(talk) 22:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't have much to add to everyone else's solid reasoning above, except to say that self-promoters are even less believable when they have no subtlety. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: He is not a notable rapper.Wasraw (talk) 13:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: He is not a well known rapper.Beckyrose233 (talk)
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per others.--vote by Alcremie (talk) 06:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.