Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mace Milly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mace Milly[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The strongest claim here is of the "got X number of clicks on a social media platform" variety, which is not an "inherent" notability freebie in any human occupation, and everything else here is pure PR bumf. And for sourcing, almost everything here is footnoted to unreliable blogs, concert listings calendars and streaming content on YouTube or Spotify, which are not notability-supporting sources -- the only footnote here that even starts to put a foot on the correct road is a very short article in a limited circulation local magazine called "Hollywood Weekly", which isn't widely distributed enough to singlehandedly get him over GNG all by itself if it's the only useful source on offer. Musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be sourced much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 01:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can only find one singular reference that passes reliability and independence, which still could be argued. The subject passes none of the criteria in WP:SINGER and definitely does not meet WP:GNG. Also very suspicious of self-publishing, as the creator of this article has only made a couple of edits which are all on, or relating to, this subject. Coreykai (talk) 02:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.