Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manhattan Fruitier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Fruitier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a gift basket shop from New York City. Claim for notability is that they not only deliver in Manhattan but also nationwide via an online store. One given source is a NYT article, but that mentions the shop only with half a sentence - the rest of the article is about the founders former job. Not enough to establish WP:N. — Ben Ben ^(talk) 15:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — Ben Ben ^(talk) 15:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — Ben Ben ^(talk) 15:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Ben Ben ^(talk) 15:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and draft/userfy as my searches found a handful of coverage here, here, here and here and a NYMAG at browser but nothing outstandingly good. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 12:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on draft/userfy: The author is a WP:SPA who left wikipedia one minute after his creation of the article. — Ben Ben ^(talk) 06:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment for the closing admin: The article has been deleted before as G5, see the log. — Ben Ben ^(talk) 19:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's blatant advertising of a non-notable company Kraxler (talk) 01:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Does not meet notability guidelines per searches. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.