Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Robert Cavendish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Robert Cavendish[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article looks very much like WP:SELFPROMOTION. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Additionally, all the sources in the article and all those that can be found via online searches do not establish notability. – Zntrip 07:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: article failed WP:BASIC. I can't find Reliable Sources that establish its WP:Notability which make it to obviously fail WP:GNG. But from my WP:NPOV, I don't think the article is WP:SELFPROMOTION Wikicology (talk) 17:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as by a mile it's promotional bollox that's absolutely useless here as it stands. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.