Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mills (fictional agent)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mills (fictional agent)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He doesn't seem to be a notable secret agent, nor does the trilogy in which he appears. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Manning O'Brine. The author is probably notable having written screenplays for a few films and published a lot of books, though finding sources will involve searching through newspaper databases. As for this character, I seriously doubt he's covered in sufficient detail for a stand-alone article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 18:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 12:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The character does not seem to have significant coverage in reliable sources. All I see on Google are a few fan sites. There's nothing worthwhile to merge, and this is an unlikely search term. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.