Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Edge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile Edge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged with advert and COI since '13, but more importantly doesn't appear to meet GNG. The cited references don't qualify and I don't see much else out there. Vrac (talk) 04:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Vrac (talk) 04:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (jaw) @ 21:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on the grounds of notability. Price comparison links, slideshows, etc do not establish notability. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 15:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One mention at USA Today; otherwise no significant independent sourcing. --MelanieN (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.