Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonomentRecords
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be currently notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- MonomentRecords (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Too soon. Just started this month for this company. Wgolf (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Zero sources found; as nom notes, company is brand new. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, company does not appear to meet notability criteria at this time. Nakon 03:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - zero news and book hits, can't find anything on the company, just seems to be far too soon for an article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:19, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.