Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necromium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Necromium

Article was originally nominated for deletion in WP:Articles for deletion/AVATAR (MUD). Since that large group AfD took place, it has not been possible to establish verifiability or notability for the subject. My own searches haven't brought any third-party reliable sources to light, hence the nomination. Gazimoff (talk) 10:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A non-notable role-playing game that does not cite sources. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 11 : 10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - found this, but I'm unsure to whether the source it's from is reliable. Only 4,000 Google hits, which doesn't bode well for its actual notability though. I'm on the fence, but I don't think that lone review is substantive enough for the article to be kept. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 02:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, therefore failing WP:N. It also pretty much fails WP:RS. Gary King (talk) 20:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't seem sufficiently notable. Markovich292 05:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.