Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon toys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon toys

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely any sources, full of WP:CRUFT. Overly broad. Gak may be able to be spun off. (Oinkers42) (talk) 13:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Toys. (Oinkers42) (talk) 13:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: The biggest product is Gak and based on a WP:BEFORE search, there are some articles on it, but the rest of the toys I cannot find reliable sources on. This article can probably be worked on more. Conyo14 (talk) 23:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If kept, the article should probably be moved to List of Nickelodeon toys. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Conyo14 (talk) 01:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Is there such a !vote as Listify? Cheers, Last1in (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.