Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One day in spring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One day in spring

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. Only sourcing I can find is AllMusic etc which has no editorial oversight. DrStrauss talk 22:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Someone needs to have a talk with the article creator. They have made quite a few articles on Banduri's work that obviously fail WP:GNG.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a note on the article creator's talk page. Sergecross73 msg me 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One day in spring (song) has been closed as delete. DrStrauss talk 17:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Currently fails the WP:GNG, created by an editor with seemingly no conception of the GNG, no sourcing has been found in the last week or so, and virtually no content is present at the article right now anyways. Usually I'd advocated for a redirect, but the respective artist could basically be described in the same manner as the album, so I'm not sure there'd be a point, it seems likely for deletion too. Sergecross73 msg me 18:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poorly sourced. Not enough evidence that this has been a notable or significant album. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:31, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.