Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PEI Media (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus that GNG/NCORP is not met Nosebagbear (talk) 11:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PEI Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence this passes WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY or such. 2008 AfD ended up with keep because back then it was enough to show google hits. All I see in BEFORE are press releases, their rewrites, and mentions in passing. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The company probably existed but no WP:NCORP coverage. (In FT it just a routine mention of the name and nothing in-depth. No google hit for scmp.com, Reuters, NYtimes.) Matthew hk (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Subsequent to the 2008 AfD, we also have a distinct article on Private Equity International and a PEI 50 redirect to list article content about that list. The previous AfD "keep" consensus appears to have been based more about these publications than the publisher. Considering PEI Media in itself, I am seeing routine acquisition coverage but not the evidence demonstrating that it has distinct notability. AllyD (talk) 13:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.