Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradiso Solutions
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:50, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Paradiso Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORP with zero substantial coverage in RS. Sources cited are press releases that are of no use for demonstrating notability. SmartSE (talk) 12:11, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. My assessment of the sources aligns with Smartse's conclusion that they are press releases, and my searches for sources returned mostly press releases.
There is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Paradiso Solutions to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
- Delete - no independent sources, web searches turn up social media and directories, fails WP:CORPDEPTH Kraxler (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.