Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poseidon (Kafka)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merged successfully. A history merge would be inappropriate, as it is not a cut-and-dried case of start on article A, then copy to article B. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poseidon (Kafka)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicate. Poseidon (short story) is about the same short story but it's a better article. The Theosophist (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I've added the info from the more recently created page to the earlier article and redirect it there. I'd merge the page histories but I'm not exactly sure how to do that. In any case, there's only one entry now rather than two. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If the only deletion rationale was that the article was a duplicate, can this nomination be withdrawn now that one article has been merged into the other? DoctorKubla (talk) 07:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Close Merge seems to solve the problem. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.